Culture of Reminiscence as a Part of Cultural Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2023.1.33.52Słowa kluczowe:
reminiscence, cultural education, cultural institution, individual memory, collective memory, social frames of memoryAbstrakt
Aim. The study explores the importance of culture of reminiscence with its identificational and integrational potential for the society and the ways that culture of reminiscence is applied within cultural institutions by means of cultural education.
Methods. We used several scientific methods such as relational and content analysis, observation, induction and heuristics.
Results. The research study summarises the role of cultural institutions within the culture of reminiscence and outlines various forms of reminiscence to be observed in cultural educational programmes. It explains the potential of cultural institutions and the roles they play within collective commemorating. It has interdisciplinary and applicational character and includes practical tips for cultural managers and cultural educators.
Conclusion. Collective memory is an important condition for reproduction of culture and cultural identities. Individual memory is determined by social and cultural contexts (reference to Maurice Halbwachs´s social frames of memory). Cultural education naturally works with the notions of collective memory, traditions, identity and reminiscence. At the same time, it resembles a tool by means of which cultural identity, character and collective memory of individuals and social groups can be consciously shaped. Beside identificational context, there is also a prospective integrational and inclusive potential of cultural education. Several forms of reminiscence are applied within cultural education: reminiscence as reconstruction; reminiscence as (re)interpretation; reminiscence as creation; reminiscence as prevention and civic involvement; reminiscence as a tool of forming cultural identity; reminiscence as an expert reflection.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Assmann, J. (2001). Kultura a paměť: Písmo, vzpomínka a politická identita v rozvinutých kulturách starověku [Culture and memory: Writing, memory, and political identity in the advanced cultures of antiquity]. Prostor.
Durkheim, E. (1926). Pravidla sociologické metody [Rules of the Sociological Method]. Orbis.
Earle, W. (2013). Cultural education: Redefining the role of museums in the 21st century. Sociology Compass, 7(7), 533-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12050
Halbwachs, M. (2009). Kolektivní paměť [Collective memory]. Sociologické nakladatelství.
Hall, S. (1997). Cultural identity and diaspora. Framework, 36, 222-237. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/english/currentstudents/postgraduate/masters/modules/asiandiaspora/hallculturalidentityanddiaspora.pdf
Johnová, R. (2008). Marketing kulturního dědictví a umění [Marketing of cultural heritage and art]. Grada Publishing.
Kapur, R. (2019). Cultural education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334364956_Cultural_Education
Landelijk Kennisinstituut Cultuureducatie en Amateurkunst. (2017). Basis for cultural education. Guide for the future of school-based and extracurricular cultural education. https://lkca.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/161001-basis-for-cultural-education-english-version.pdf
Lavabre, M. C. (2005). Užívání a zneužívání pojmu paměť [The notion of memory used and misused]. Biograf, 37(15), 57–67.
Ledoux, S. (2022). The pedagogy of collective memory. Digital Encyclopedia of European History. https://ehne.fr/en/encyclopedia/themes/education-teaching-and-professional-training/pedagogy-and-pedagogist-in-europe-xixth-xxth/pedagogy-collective-memory-in-europe
Malitskaya, O. V. (2017). Kuljturotvorcha dijaljnistj jak priorytet suchasnoji vyshchoji osvity [Cultural-Creative Activity as a Priority of the Contemporary Higher Education]. Young Scientist, 1(41), 117-120. http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/2017/1/28.pdf
Maslowski, N., Šubrt, J., Lehman, Š., Hroch, M., Kubišová, Z., Horský, J., Tuček, J., Maur, E., Smyčka, V., Dvořák, T., Tomášek, M., Szaló, C., Hamar, E., Mlynař, J., Šmídová–Matoušová, O. (2014). Kolektivní paměť: K teoretickým otázkám [Collective memory: on theoretical issues]. Univerzita Karlova.
Plato. (1992). Euthydémos. Menón [Euthydemus. Menon] (F. Novotný, Trans.). Oikoymenh. (Original work published c. 384 BC).
Rohanova, M. V. (2018). Kuljturolohichni osnovy pedahohichnoji osvity [Culturological bases of Pedagogical Education]. Spiriuality of Personality: Methodology, theory and practice, 6(87), 127-133. https://oaji.net/articles/2019/690-1555699026.pdf
Sorabji, R. (1995). Aristoteles – O paměti [Aristotle On memory] (M. Pokorný, Trans.). Petr Rezek. (Original work published 1972).
Šubrt, J. (2011). Antinomie sociální paměti [Antinomy of Social Memory]. Sociológia, 43, 133-157. Sociologické nakladatelství.
Young, P. (2014). The Presence of Culture in Learning. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research and Educational Communications on Technology (pp. 349-361). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_28
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2023 Kristína Jakubovská, Viera Jakubovská
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
