“Text-Led” or “Idea-Led” Literary Theories Eliminating Marginalization. Undercutting Eurocentric (Culture), Androcentric (Gender), and Heterosexual Supremacy (Sexual Orientation)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.2.781.792Słowa kluczowe:
endocentric, androcentric, text-led, idea-led, essentialism, anti-essentialism, sadomasochistic, butch-femmeAbstrakt
Aim. This paper aims to find the origin of major literary theories and their domains. Literary theories often bear differences under the three major categories, “Eurocentrism”, “Androcentricism”, and “Heterosexual Supremacy”. Out of which, “Eurocentricism” talks about the Western look at the rest of the world as begging, illogical, unscientific, and strange (cultural sense of other), “Androcentricism” vents out gender marginalization and “Heterosexual Supremacy” excludes homosexuality.
Methods. Some major theories are interpreted under the above given three segregations like Structuralism removes all the Western dominance (Eurocentricism) or Gender biases (Androcentricism) shown in the text with lexis, codes, and interspersed digressions, and the Queer theory rejects the “Heterosexual Supremacy”. Special preference is given to theories which are idea-led.
Results. This research highlights that in the ‘Text-led’ theories, Structuralism, Post-Structuralism, Russian Formalism and Sigmund Freud’s Psychoanalysis work on the text to find the generalized meaning of the text, and in the ‘Idea-led’ philosophies like Louis Althusser’s Marxism, New Historicism or Cultural Materialism focus on ideas with wider approach of accepting the fact that a literary work is affected by multiple causes and can result in various interpretations of the works.
Conclusion. This research tries to prove that marginalization is the genesis of literary theories, as these theories serve as tools to expose overtly the process of marginalization to the world. This research paper also talks about bisexuality’s support by any new theory that has yet to register in the list of literary theories. This research paper proves that all literary theories are developed for some widespread generic reasons in favour of the betterment of our society. Reading this research one can find the real way to apply the literary theories for discourse analysis.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Althusser, L., & Balibar, É. (2025). On the reproduction of capitalism: Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. Verso Books.
Barry, P. (2002). Beginning theory: An introduction to literary and cultural theory (2nd ed.). Manchester University Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. MIT Press.
Britannica. (1998, July 20). F.R. Leavis | British literary critic & literary theory pioneer. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/F-R-Leavis#ref997483
Cuddon, J. A., & Preston, C. E. (1999). The Penguin Dictionary of literary terms and Literary Theory (4th ed.). Penguin.
De Beauvoir, S. (1949). The Second Sex. Newuniversityinexileconsortium.org. https://newuniversityinexileconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Simone-de-Beauvoir-The-Second-Sex-Jonathan-Cape-1956.pdf
Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Eliot, T. S. (2009). Tradition and the Individual Talent. Poetry Foundation. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/69400/tradition-and-the-individual-talent
Engels, F. (2010). The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. Penguin UK. (Original work published 1884)
Klages, M. (2010). Klages on C. Lévi-Strauss. Uidaho.edu. https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~sflores/KlagesLevi-Strauss.html
Lyotard, J.-F. (1999). The differend: Phrases in dispute. University Of Minnesota Press.
Mill, J. S. (2006). The subjection of women. Pennsylvania State University.
Shelley, P. B. (2013). A defence of poetry and other essays (Original work published 1840). Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/5428/5428-h/5428-h.htm
Wollstonecraft, M. (2019). A vindication of the rights of men; A vindication of the rights of woman; An historical and moral view of the French Revolution. Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1792)
Woolf, V. (1929). A room of one’s own. Hogarth Press.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Lalit Gehlot, Hailah Alkhalaf, Dr. Prerna Srivastava, Swati Gokhru , Sangeetha Noval, Dr Ritu Raj Choudhary
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
