Debutant Teachers’ Perceptions of the Benefits of the Discussion Method in University Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.2.615.633Słowa kluczowe:
discussion, discussion method, communicative competence , virtual learning environment, beginning university teachersAbstrakt
Aim. This study investigates how first-year Ph.D. students who lack prior teaching experience perceive the role of virtual discussions in developing their teaching-related competencies, including pedagogical and communicative skills.
Methods. Data collected from debutant Ph.D. students at three universities in 2021, 2022, and 2023 was analysed using a phenomenographic approach. The Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework (Garrison et al., 2000) guided the design of discussion tasks and the analysis of students' experiences, enabling a deeper understanding of the value students place on virtual discussions.
Results. The analysis identified four primary benefits of virtual discussions in the study process: (1) as an interactive study method, (2) as a medium for enhancing clarity in thought articulation, (3) as a tool for developing topic-specific discussion skills, and (4) as a way to foster personal growth in communicative competencies. These benefits contribute to Ph.D. students' preparedness to engage in collaborative academic environments and build essential interpersonal skills.
Conclusions. Even though the discussion method and the discussion are treated as an "unusual study" format, the discussion method is not familiar to debutant teachers with no teacher training background. If organised correctly, the discussion increases students' social and cognitive presence and fosters critical thinking and empathy. Virtual discussions serve as a valuable learning tool and contribute to developing valuable skills and enhancing participants' academic and personal growth. The findings suggest that incorporating structured virtual discussions as an instructional method in synchronous higher education settings could be beneficial for developing Ph.D. s
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Abdulbaki, K., Suhaimi, M., Alsaqqaf, A., & Jawad, W. (2018). The Use of the Discussion Method at University: Enhancement of Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(6), 118-128.
Åkerlind, G. S. (2012). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(1), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.642845
Åkerlind G. S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284672
Alabbasi, Z., H., K. (2022). Rhetorical Questions as a stylistic device in English political speeches. Eurasian Journal of Research, Development and Innovation, 7, 22–29. https://geniusjournals.org/index.php/ejrdi/article/view/1039
Audi, R. (2012). Virtue ethics as a resource in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 273–291.
Borg, S. (2019). Language Teacher Cognition: Perspectives and Debates. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 1149-1170). Springer.
Boughzala, I., Garmaki, M., & Chourabi, O. (2020). Understanding How Digital Intelligence Contributes to Digital Creativity and Digital Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 320–329). http://hdl.handle.net/10125/63779
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Brookfield, S. D., Rudolph, J., & Tan, S. (2022). Powerful teaching, the paradox of empowerment and the powers of Foucault. An interview with Professor Stephen Brookfield. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 131-145.
Buckingham, L. R., López-Hernández, A., & Strotmann, B. (2021). Learning by Comparison: The Benefits of Co-Teaching for University Professors’ Professional Development. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.776991
Dahlgren L., & Fallsberg M. (1991). Phenomenography as a qualitative approach in social pharmacy research. Journal of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 8(4), 150-156.
Darabi, A., Arrastia, M. C., Nelson, D. W., Cornille, T., & Liang, X. (2011). Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: A comparison of four discussion strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 216-227.
Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Userfriendly Guide for Social Scientists. Routledge.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, A. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
Entwistle, N. (1997). Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 127- 134.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Gao, H., Xu, S., Yang, L., & Hu, X. (2022). The double-edged sword effect of argumentative scaffolding on group discussion in an adaptive discussion system. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997522
Garrison, D. R. Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2015). Why Should Anyone Be Led By You? What It Takes To Be an Authentic Leader. Harvard Business Review Press.
Gutiérrez-Puertas, L., Márquez-Hernández, V. V., Gutiérrez-Puertas, V., Granados-Gámez, G., & Aguilera-Manrique, G. (2020). Educational interventions for nursing students to develop communication skills with patients: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072241
Henderikx, M., & Stoffers, J. (2022). An exploratory literature study into digital transformation and leadership: Toward future-proof middle managers. Sustainability, 14(2).
Henly, S. J. (2016). Health communication research for nursing science and practice. Nursing Research, 65(4), 257-258. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000171
Hirudayaraj, M., Baker, R., Baker, F., & Eastman, M. (2021). Soft skills for entry-level engineers: What employers want. Education Sciences, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100641
Iman, J. N., & Angraini, N. (2019). Discussion task model in EFL classroom: EFL learners’ perception, oral proficiency, and critical thinking achievements. Pedagogika, 133(1), 43-32.
Koh, D., Lee, K., & Joshi, K. (2019). Transformational leadership and creativity: A meta‐analytic review and identification of an integrated model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(6), 625-650. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2355
Kvale, S. (1994). Ten standard Objections to Qualitative Research Interviews. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 25(2), 147–173.
Liu, D., Bhagat, K. K., Gao, Y., & Chang, T. (2017). The potentials and trends of virtual reality in education A bibliometric analysis on top research studies in the last two decades. In D. Liu, C. Dede, R. Huang, & J. Richards (Eds.), Virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education (pp. 105–130). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7
Lock, J., & Redmond, P. (2021). Embedded experts in online collaborative learning: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100773
Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Monti, M., Klöckner-Cronauer, C., Hautz, S. C., Schnabel, K. P., Breckwoldt, J., Junod-Perron, Peller S., Bonvin R. & Huwendiek, S. (2020). Improving the assessment of communication competencies in a national licensing OSCE: lessons learned from an experts’ symposium. BMC Medical Education, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02079-4
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18.
Murphy, P. K., Firetto, C. M., Lloyd, G. M., Wei, L., & Baszczewski, S. E. (2020). Classroom discussions. Oxford research encyclopedia of education. https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-869
Parra, G. E. C. (2000). Learning English through online discussion groups. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,44(1), 36–38. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40016856
Patterson, R. W. K. (1979). Values, education, and the adult. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (3 edition). SAGE Publications.
Rath, T., & Conchie, B. (2008). Strengths Based Leadership: Great Leaders, Teams, and Why People Follow. Gallup Press.
Rowe, C. (2007). The place of the Republic in Plato’s political thought. In G. R. F. Ferrari (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic (pp. 27–54). Cambridge University Press.
Schlesselman, L. S. (2020). Perspective from a teaching and learning center during emergency remote teaching. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(8).
Smaling, A. (2003). Inductive, analogical, and communicative generalization. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1). http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/2_1/html/smaling.html
Smaling, A. (2003). Inductive, analogical, and communicative generalization. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(5), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200105
Smith B., & McGannon K. R. (2017). Developing Rigor in Qualitative Research: Problems and Opportunities within Sport and Exercise Psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101-121.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Integrating Online Discussion in an Australian Intensive English Language Course. TESOL Journal, 11(3), 31–35.
Szabo, Z., & Schwartz, J. (2011). Learning methods for teacher education: The use of online discussions to improve critical thinking. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 79-94.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Metho-Dology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Sage Publications.
Yang, Z., & Liu, Q. (2007). Research and development of Web-based virtual online-e classroom. Computers & Education, 48, 171–184.
Yin, R.K. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage.
Yoo, H., Jang, J., Oh, H., & Park, I. (2022). The potentials and trends of holography in education: A scoping review. Computers & Education, 186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104533
Yunis, H. (Ed.). (2011). Plato: Phaedrus. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977237
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Ilona Valantinaitė, Živilė Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Vaida Asakavičiūtė
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
