Formation of Preschoolers' Communicative Competence in the Conditions of Inclusive Education

Authors

  • Olha Turko Department of Philological Disciplines of Primary and Preschool Education, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University
  • Tatiana Olender Department of Foreign Languages Faculty, Faculty of Foreign Languages Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1665-6413
  • Maria Boyko Department of Pedagogy and Methods of Primary and Preschool Education, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University
  • Olga Petryshyna Department of Ukrainian Language and Methods of Its Teaching Faculty of Philology and Journalism, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University
  • Tetiana Rozhko-Pavlyshyn Department of Pedagogy and Methods of Primary and Preschool Education, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-5982

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.1.239.255

Keywords:

communicative competence, corrective work, folklore, inclusive education, language-didactic tools, preschooler

Abstract

Aim. The goal of the study is to describe the teacher’s corrective work on pre-schoolers’ sound pronunciation that is developed according to the children’s age, physiological and mental norms, and special educational needs.

Methods. Four children with special educational needs participated in this experimental study. We used the method of monitoring children’s speech during various activities: play, household activity and teaching (during speech therapy classes and various types of practical language classes).

Results and conclusion. Age-related features of pre-schoolers’ speech development have been identified in the study. The reasons and indicators of pre-schoolers’ speech development disorders have been described, and the ways to overcome language disorders have been found. The experimental study tested the effectiveness of articulation exercises in working with children with special educational needs in an inclusive environment, the involvement of psychologists and children’s parents to overcome speech disorders of pre-schoolers, and the use of folklore texts.

Originality. In the experimental study, we observed that riddles, proverbs, ditties, tongue twisters, fairy tales, lullabies, nursery rhymes, counting rhymes, and sayings are an effective means of phonetics and articulation work, during both the speech development classes and other classes as well as during walks.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Olha Turko, Department of Philological Disciplines of Primary and Preschool Education, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University

Turko Olha, PhDin Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department of Philological Disciplines of Primary and Preschool Education, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ukraine. Her scientific interests are higher education, foreign language teaching methods, syntax, linguodidactics.

Tatiana Olender, Department of Foreign Languages Faculty, Faculty of Foreign Languages Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University

Olendr Tetiana, PhD in Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, Facultyof Foreign Languages,Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ukraine. Her scientific interests areComparative Pedagogy, English TeachingMethods.

Maria Boyko, Department of Pedagogy and Methods of Primary and Preschool Education, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University

Boyko Mariya, PhDin Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Pedagogy and Methods of Primary and Preschool Education, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ukraine.Her scientific interests arehigher school pedagogy, quality of higher education.

Olga Petryshyna, Department of Ukrainian Language and Methods of Its Teaching Faculty of Philology and Journalism, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University

Petryshyna Olga, PhD in Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department of the Ukrainian Language and Methods of its Teaching, Faculty of Philology and Journalism, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ukraine. Her scientific interests are methods of the Ukrainian language teaching, public communication, features of religious discourse, stylistics.

Tetiana Rozhko-Pavlyshyn, Department of Pedagogy and Methods of Primary and Preschool Education, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University

Rozhko-Pavlyshyn Tetiana, PhD in Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Pedagogy and Methods of Primary and Preschool Education, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ukraine.Her scientific interests areeducation for sustainable development, upbringing of preschool children, professional realization of future educators of preschool education institutions.

References

Agranovich, Z. E. (2004). V pomoshch’ logopedam i roditelyam [To help speech therapists and parents].Sankt-Peterburg: Detstvo-press.

Arutiunova, N. D. (1976). Predlozhenie i ego smysl: logiko-semanticheskie problemy [The sentence and its meaning: Logical-semantic problems]. Moskva: Nauka.

Bielienka, H. V. (2015). Pidhotovka majbutnich vychovateliv do roboty z diťmy doškiľnoho viku: kompetentnisnyj pidchid: Monohrafija [Preparing future educators to work with preschool children: A competence approach: A monograph]. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo Kyivskoho universytetu imeni B. Hrinchenka.

Bohdanova, I. M., Buzhina, I. V., & Didus’, N. I. (2003). Pedahohika [Pedagogy]. Kharkiv: Odissei.

Bohush, A. M. (2004). Movlennievyj komponent doškiľnoji osvity [Speech component of preschool education].Odesa: Yaroslav.

Chafe, W. L. (1975). Znachenie i struktura yazyka [Meaning and the structure of language]. Moskva: Progress.

Dmytrenko, K. A., Konovalova, M.V., Semivolos, O. P., & Beketova, S. V. (2018). Zvyčajni formy roboty – novyj pidchid: Rozvyvajemo kliučovi kompetentnosti [Common forms of work — New approach: Developing key competencies]. Kharkiv: Osnova.

Filicheva, T. B., Cheveleva, N. A., & Chirkina, G. V. (1989).Osnovy logopedii [Basics of speech therapy]. Moskva: Prosveshchenie.

Halinen, I., & Järvinen, R. (2008). Towards inclusive education: The case of Finland. Prospects. 38, 77 – 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-008-9061-2.

Kalmykova, L. O. (2003). Formuvannia movlennievych umiń i navyčok u ditej: psycholinhvistyčnyj ta linhvometodyčni aspekty [Formation of children’s speech skills: Psycholinguistic and linguistic – methodological aspects]. Kyiv: NMTsVO.

Kalmykova, L. O. (2008). Psycholohija formuvannia movlennievoji dijaľnosti u ditej doškiľnoho viku: monohrafija [The psychology of pre-schoolers’ speech activity formation: A monograph]. Kyiv: Feniks.

Kashe, G. A. (1972). Korrektsiya rechi u detey doshkol’nogo vozrasta [Correction of pre-schoolers’ speech disorders]. Moskva: Prosveshchenie.

Leont’ev, A. A. (2008). Psikhologiya obshcheniya [Psychology of communication]. Moskva: Smysl.

Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2010). Koncepcija rozvytku inkliuzyvnoji osvity (Nakaz Ministerstva osvity i nauky Ukrajiny (MON Ukrajiny) vid 01.10.2010 №912 [Concept for the development of inclusive education (Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (MES of Ukraine) from 1 October 2010 No. 912]. https://mon.gov.ua/ua/npa/pro-zatverdzhennya-kontseptsii-rozvitku-inklyuzivnogo-navchannya.

Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2018). Pro orhanizaciju dijaľnosti inkliuzyvnych hrup u jaslach. Lyst MON Ukrajiny vid 13 lystopada 2018 [On the organization of activity of inclusive groups in nursery schools. Letter of MES of Ukraine. 13 November 2018]. https://mon.gov.ua/ua/npa/list-mon-shodo-organizaciyi-diyalnosti-inklyuzivnih-grup-v-zakladah-doshkilnoyi-osviti.

Poltorakina, N. Y. (2021). Rozvytok komunikatyvnoji kompetentnosti doškiľnykiv. Portal “Vseosvita” [Development of pre-schoolers’ communicative competence. Portal “Vseosvita”]. https://vseosvita.ua/library/rozvitok-komunikativnoi-kompetentnosti-doskilnat-456520.html.

Tolochko, S. V. (2018). Analiz dosvidu krajin Jevropejśkoho Sojuzu u vyrišenni sučasnych problem osvity i nauky [Analysis of the experience of the countries of the European Union in solving modern problems in education and science]. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, 6(26), 9–14.

Vatuitniev, M. (1977). Kommunikativnost’ Obucheniya russkomu yazyku v shkolakh za rubezhom [Communicativeness of teaching Russian in schools abroad]. Rus. Yazyk Za Rub. 6, 38–45.

Zaporozhets, A. V. (1972). Pedahohični ta psycholohični problemy vsebičnoho rozvytku ta pidhotovky do školy staršych doškiľnykiv [Pedagogical and psychological problems of comprehensive development and preparation of senior pre-schoolers for school]. Preschool education, 4, 37–42.

Zhebrovskyi, B. M. (2014). Prohrama rozvytku ditej vid prenataľnoho periodu do tŕoch rokiv „Oberih” [The programme of the children development from the prenatal period to the age of three “Oberih”]. Ternopil: Mandrivets. https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/programy-rozvytku-ditey/programaoberig.pdf.

Zhu J., Li, H., & Hsie W.-Y. (2019). Implementing inclusive education in an early childhood setting: A case study of a Hong Kong kindergarten. Early Child Development & Care, 189, 207–219.

Zhukova, N. S., Mastiukova, E. M., & Filicheva, T. B. (2000). Preodolenie Nedorazviti yarechi u detey [Overcoming children’s general speech underdevelopment]. Ekaterinburg: LITUR.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Turko, O., Olender, T., Boyko, M., Petryshyna, O., & Rozhko-Pavlyshyn, T. (2022). Formation of Preschoolers’ Communicative Competence in the Conditions of Inclusive Education. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 13(1), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.1.239.255

Most read articles by the same author(s)