When Learning Readiness Fails to Predict Science Conceptual Understanding: Structural Evidence from Elementary Education in the Society 5.0 Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.351.375Słowa kluczowe:
learning readiness, science conceptual understanding, PLS-SEM, Society 5.0, elementary science educationAbstrakt
Aim. This study examines whether learning readiness functions primarily as a direct cognitive engine of science conceptual understanding or more strongly as an enabling behavioural infrastructure that supports students’ participation in learning processes among fourth-grade students in the Society 5.0 context.
Methods. A quantitative explanatory design was employed. Data were collected from 320 Grade 4 students in public elementary schools and analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The model integrates Learning Readiness, Digital Capability, Learning Motivation, and Self-Directed Learning as learning process constructs, and Science Conceptual Understanding as a higher-order cognitive construct reflected by Physical Changes, Force and Motion, and Life and Environment.
Result. The findings reveal a pronounced structural asymmetry. Learning Readiness strongly predicts Digital Capability, Learning Motivation, and Self-Directed Learning, explaining approximately 70–80% of the variance in learning behaviour, yet demonstrates negligible explanatory power for Science Conceptual Understanding. In contrast, Science Conceptual Understanding demonstrates strong internal coherence across its domains, indicating a stable higher-order cognitive structure. The findings further suggest that behavioural readiness alone may not be sufficient to directly support conceptual mastery under constrained digital and instructional conditions.
Conclusion. These results indicate that while learning readiness effectively shapes students’ behavioural engagement in learning, conceptual understanding appears to depend more strongly on instructional quality, inquiry-oriented pedagogy, conceptual scaffolding, and pedagogically guided science learning experiences within elementary classrooms.
Cognitive value. This study repositions learning readiness not simply as a direct cognitive engine of conceptual mastery, but as an enabling behavioural infrastructure whose contribution to conceptual understanding may be shaped by broader instructional and pedagogical conditions in Society 5.0-oriented elementary science education.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Ahmed, W. (2023). Understanding self-directed learning behavior towards digital competence among business research students: SEM-neural analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4173–4202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11384-y
Aisyah, S., & Syarah, E. S. (2024). Early childhood teacher education students’ online learning readiness and course satisfaction: Best service from the Indonesian Open University. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(10), 1471–1481. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.10.2178
Alonso-García, S., Victoria Maldonado, J.-J., Martínez Domingo, J.-A., & Berral Ortiz, B. (2024). Analysis of self-perceived digital competences in future educators: A study at the University of Granada. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2521
Alshammari, M. H., & Alshammari, S. H. (2022). Examining students’ readiness toward using learning management system at University of Ha’il: A structural equation modelling approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(22), Article 15221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215221
Althabhawi, N. M., Zainol, Z. A., & Bagheri, P. (2022). Society 5.0: A new challenge to legal norms. Sriwijaya Law Review, 6(1) 41–54. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1.1415.pp41-54
Andrich, D., Marais, I., & Humphry, S. (2012). Using a theorem by Andersen and the Dichotomous Rasch Model to assess the presence of random guessing in multiple choice items. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 37(3), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998611411914
Arviani, F. P., Wahyudin, D., & Dewi, L. (2023). Role of teaching strategies in promoting students’ higher order thinking skills and critical thinking dispositions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), Article 9, https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.9.19
Calp, M. H., & Bütüner, R. (2022). Society 5.0: Effective technology for a smart society. In A. E. Hassanien, J. M. Chatterjee, & V. Jain (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Industry 4.0 (pp. 175–194). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-88468-6.00006-1
Chien, H.-Y., Yeh, Y.-C., & Kwok, O.-M. (2022). How online learning readiness can predict online learning emotional states and expected academic outcomes: Testing a theoretically based mediation model. Online Learning Journal, 26(4), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.3483
Chistyakov, A. A., Zhdanov, S. P., Avdeeva, E. L., Dyadichenko, E. A., Kunitsyna, M. L., & Yagudina, R. I. (2023). Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), Article em2256. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13128
Elshaer, I. A., Azzaz, A. M. S., Mohammad, A. A. A., & Fayyad, S. (2025). Decoding success: The role of e-learning readiness in linking technological skills and employability in hospitality management graduates. Information (Switzerland), 16(1), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16010047
Gitadewi, A. J. (2024). Optimizing digital literacy through problem-based learning models to improve student’s critical thinking skills. International Journal of Current Educational Research, 3(2), 110-123. https://doi.org/10.53621/ijocer.v3i2.379
Gómez, R. L., & Suárez, A. M. (2020). Do inquiry-based teaching and school climate influence science achievement and critical thinking? Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00240-5
Hidayat, H., Hidayah, N., Rusmana, N., Afdal, A., Hariko, R., & Tririzky, R. (2024). The effect of using smart application on critical literacy of engineering education students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(6), 834–844. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.6.2109
Ibrahim, M., Al-Sinawi, S. H. N., Yanju, S., & Musah, M. B. (2022). Predictors of online learning readiness and their consequences on learning engagement and perceived teaching quality during Covid19. World Journal of English Language, 12(7), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n7p206
Itasanmi, S. A., Ajani, O. A., Ushie, G. B., & Babalola, S. S. (2025). Exploratory analysis of online learning readiness of graduate students using a modified unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 12(3), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v12i3.7394
Kreiner, S. (2012). The Rasch Model for dichotomous items. In K.B. Christensen, S. Kreiner and M. Mesbah (Eds.), Rasch Models in Health (pp. 5–26). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118574454.ch1
Legi, H., Damanik, D., & Giban, Y. (2023). Transforming education through technological innovation in the face of the era of Society 5.0. Educenter: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(2), 102-108. https://doi.org/10.55904/educenter.v2i2.822
Marliana, R. R., Suhayati, M., & Ningsih, S. B. H. (2023). Schwarz’s Bayesian Information Criteria: A model selection between Bayesian-SEM and Partial Least Squares-SEM on a relationship among SDLR, e-learning readiness and learning motivation. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, 19(4), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.18187/PJSOR.V19I4.4146
Mukaromah, L., Sutarto, J., Subali, B., & Raihan, P. D. (2024). Development of interactive food web learning media to improve mastery of science concepts and student creativity. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2674–2678. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.6901
Ngah, A. H., Kamalrulzaman, N. I., Mohamad, M. F. H., Rashid, R. A., Harun, N. O., Ariffin, N. A., & Abu Osman, N. A. A. (2022). The sequential mediation model of students’ willingness to continue online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00188-w
Ong, M. H. A., Yasin, N. M., & Ibrahim, N. S. (2021). Immersive experience during Covid-19: The mediator role of alternative assessment in online learning environment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(18), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i18.24541
Polat, E., Hopcan, S., & Yahşi, Ö. (2022). Are K-12 teachers ready for e-learning? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(2), 214–241. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i2.6082
Prabu Kumar, A. P., Omprakash, A., Mani, P. K. C., Swaminathan, N., K, K., Maruthy, K. N., Sathiyasekaran, B. W. C., Vijayaraghavan, P. V., & Padmavathi, R. (2021). Validation of internal structure of self-directed learning readiness scale among Indian Medical students using factor analysis and the structural equation modelling approach. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), Article 614. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03035-6
Prihastiwi, W. J., Wiyono, B. B., Chusniyah, T., & Eva, N. (2024). Self-Directed Learning Readiness Model: A mediating role of self-efficacy among need-supportive teaching style, transformational parenting and emotional intelligence. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.397
Putri, S. U., Sumiati, T., & Larasati, I. (2019). Improving creative thinking skill through Project-Based-Learning in science for primary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, Article 022052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022052
Ramos, A. M., Lee, H., & Mabuan, R. A. (2025). Exploring the relationship among preservice teachers’ e-learning readiness, learning engagement, and learning performance in HyFlex learning environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(2), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i2.8165
Sarkam, N. A., Nasrudin, N. H., Razi, N. F. M., & Junid, R. A. (2022). Student readiness factors for online distance learning among Malaysian public universities during COVID-19: A conceptual model. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(4), 1048–1061.
Vasli, P., & AsadiParvar-Masouleh, H. (2024). Self-directed learning and clinical competence: The mediating role of the clinical learning environment. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 19(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2023.11.004
Wagiran, W., Suharjana, S., Nurtanto, M., & Mutohhari, F. (2022). Determining the e-learning readiness of higher education students: A study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 8(10), Article e11160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11160
Zubairi, A. M., & Kassim, N. L. A. (2006). Classical And Rasch Analyses Of Dichotomously Scored Reading Comprehension Test Items. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 2, 1-20.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2026 Primus Devra Raihan, Woro Sri Hastuti , Ali Mustadi , Aqidatul Munfariqoh, Ahmad Saiful Rizal, Rosantika Utami Setyoningsih, Hasnah Setiani
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
