Types of Knowledge in Post-Scientistic Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.2.7.16Słowa kluczowe:
philosophy of science, tacit knowledge, episteme, doxa, experts, pseudoscience, fake news, postmodernism, constructivismAbstrakt
At times of informational deluge, the man in the street is especially vulnerable to the harmful influence of media, to which not only closed groups of people sharing the same beliefs and views contribute but also bots and trolls spreading fake news in the form of conspiracy theories, misinformation, disinformation and propaganda. This audience without proper education and not reflecting on the information gained, can spread more information of this type. Scholars closed in their own reality, conceived of only their inerrancy not only are unable to support, but also are not conducive to the development of science. They also vilify people having different views and the representatives of other disciplines, which they consider inferior. This introduction presents the value of different types of knowledge, not only the scientific ones, and shows its importance for people who may not have other possibilities to learn and understand true science which indicates the meaning of knowledge, which is accessible for people without an academic education. Different types of knowledge, even the seemingly non-scientific type, are the basics for human development and learning. The key to this development, however, is teaching critical thinking. Essential for any change is also the proper choice of academic powers, appreciating and supporting researchers who really affect science, apart from the closed environment of faithful fanatics, and who are able to do science at a global level.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Baran, B. (2003). Postmodernizm i końce wieku [Postmodernism and the end of the century]. Inter Esse.
Baudrillard, J. (1988). Selected writings. Stanford University Press.
Dilthey, W. C. (2010). Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften V1: Versuch einer Grundlegung fur das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte [Introduction to the Humanities V1: An attempt to lay the foundations for the study of society and history]. Kessinger Publishing. (Original work published 1922)
Eliade, M. (1968). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion. HarperOne.
Furedi, F. (2004). Where have all the intellectuals gone?: Confronting twenty-first century philistinism. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Górecki, M. (2019). Nauka równoległa. Forum Akademickie, 10.
Habermas, J. (1986). Theory of communicative action v1: Reason and the rationalisation of society. Polity Press.
Hill, C. T. (2007). The post-scientific society. Issues in Science and Technology, 24(1), 78-84.
Jashapara, A. (2004). Knowledge management: An integrated approach. Pearson Education.
Kondrla, P., & Durkova, E. 2018. Interpersonal relations in ethics of science and technologies. Communications – Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 20(11), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.26552/com.C.2018.1A.45-50
Kondrla P., & Králik, R. (2016). Authentic being and moral conscience. European Journal of Science and Theology, 12(4), 155-164.
Kondrla, P., Lojan, R., Maturkanič, P., Biryukova, Y. N., Mastrapa, E. G. (2023). The philosophical context of curriculum innovations with a focus on competence development. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 14(2), 78–92.
Kondrla, P., Ďurková, E., & Trstenský, F. (2024). Selected aspects in the perception of sustainability values among religious education teaching students. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(1), 73 -84.
Králik, R. (2017a). Kierkegaard’s interpretation of faith. XLinguae, 10(3), 37-44.
Králik, R. (2017b). Søren Kierkegaard’s influence on the thinking of Karol Nandrásky. European Journal of Science and Theology, 13(1), 25-34.
Králik, R., Roubalová, M., Judák, V., Hlad, Ľ., & Ďatelinka, A. (2022). Může Bůh Izraele podle rabínské tradice požadovat od svých vyznavačů v sociální oblasti nemožné? [Can the God of Israel, according to the Rabbinical tradition, demand the impossible of His followers in the social area?]. Historia Ecclesiastica, 13(1), 3–21.
Krimsky, S. (2004). Science in the private interest. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Harvard University Press.
Marmion, J. F. (2018). Psychologie de la connerie. Sciences Humaines Eds.
Olszewska-Dyoniziak, B. (2001). Człowiek-kultura-osobowość [Human-culture-personality]. Atla 2.
Pavlíková, M. (2018). The power of modern technologies in the fiction of Don DeLillo. Communications — Scientific Letters of the University of Žilina, 20(1A), 57-60.
Pavlíková, M., & Ambrozy, M. (2019). Extremely gifted students and teaching philosophy in secondary school. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, I. Candel Torres (Eds.), ICERI2019 Proceedings: 12th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (pp. 6474-6479). IATED Academy.
Pavlíková, M., & Tavilla, I. (2023). Repetition as a path to authentic existence in Kierkegaard’s work. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 14(2), 105-115.
Popper, K. (1962). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Basic Books.
Roubalová, M., Hlad, Ľ., Šuráb, M., Maturkanič, P., & Králik, R. (2023). Teologické důrazy zákazu přijímat úplatek v kontextu Tanachu a Rabínské tradice [Theological implications of the prohibition of accepting bribes in the context of Tanakh and Rabbinic tradition]. Historia Ecclesiastica, 14(1), 179-200.
Roubalová, M., Maturkanič, P., Bursová, J., Kondrla, P., & Zimny, J. (2022). Shabbat as projection of freedom in Tanakh and Rabinic Judaism. XLinguae, 15(1), 148-159. http://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2022.15.01.15
Sharma, V., Sultana, F., Alam, S., & Banu, S. (2024). Trolling as a disruptive tool for human rights violations: An exploration of the challenges faced by performance artists. World Journal of English Language, 14(4), 411-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n4p411
Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals abuse of science. Picador.
Such, J., & Szcześniak, M. (2002). Filozofia nauki [The philosophy of science]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Svoboda, M., Medzihorský, S., Gruber, J., Janackova, L., Surab., M., & Králik, R. (2024). Manipulation as a risk factor for psycho-social health. Acta Missiologica, 18(1), 43-54.
Szwabowski, O. (2019). Nekrofilna produkcja akademicka i pieśni partyzantów. Instytut Pedagogiki Uniwerystetu Wrocławskiego.
Tkáčová, H., Pavlíková, M., Azizi, M., & Sotirofski, K. (2023). Oversharing of content online by children during the holidays and parental control. Acta Missiologica, 17(2), 75-84.
Tkáčová, H., Pavlikova, M., Maturkanič, P., & Slobodová-Nováková, K. (2023). Online media audience during the Covid-19 pandemic as an active amplifier of disinformation: Motivations of University students to share information on Facebook. Communication Today, 14(2), 154–167.
Weber, M. (1995). Wissenschaft als Beruf [Science as a profession]. Reklam.
Witkowski, L. (2009). Cztery ligi w nauce polskiej [Four leagues in Polish science]. Acta Universitatis Nicolai Copernici. Nauki Humanistyczno-Społeczne. Pedagogika, 25, 183-193.
Zayas, M. G., Jarmoch, E., Maturkanič, P., Paľa, G., & Kondrla, P. (2024). Literary and arts sciences. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(1), 475-488. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.475.488
Zeb, S., Ajmal, M., Alam, S., & Banu, S. (2024). Political discourse analysis of Donald Trump’s rhetoric: A linguistic study of cognition and discursivity. World Journal of English Language, 14(5), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n5p207
Zeb, S., Ajmal, M., Pavlíková, M., Alam, S., Ahmad, F., & Banu, S. (2024). One word and multiple senses: John Locke’s philosophy of abuse of. World Journal of English Language, 14(6), 417-425. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n6p417
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2024 Aleksander Kobylarek
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
