The Khan Academy Platform in the Mathematics Learning Process in Military Training

Authors

  • Magaly Margarita Narváez Rios Social Sciences, Education and Humanities, Private Technical University of Loja, San Cayetano Alto, C. París, 110107, Loja, Ecuador & Faculty of Human Sciences and Education, Technical University of Ambato, Av. de Los Chasquis y Río Payamíno, 180329, Ambato, Ecuador
  • José Ramón Delgado Fernández Social Sciences, Education and Humanities, Private Technical University of Loja, San Cayetano Alto, C. París, 110107, Loja, Ecuador
  • Derling José Mendoza Velazco Initial Education Career, National University of Education, Panamericana 1, Chuquipata, 030154, Cañar, Ecuador
  • Diego Santiago Andrade Naranjo Faculty of Human Sciences and Education, Technical University of Ambato, Av. de Los Chasquis y Río Payamíno, 180329, Ambato, Ecuador

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.495.517

Keywords:

mathematics education, Khan Academy, digital platforms, military training, Ecuador

Abstract

Aim. To analyse the effectiveness of Khan Academy in strengthening mathematical learning among first-year cadets in an Ecuadorian military training context.

Methods. A quantitative quasi-experimental one-group pre-test/post-test design was conducted with 65 cadets from the Escuela de Formacion de Soldados "Vencedores del Cenepa". Instrument reliability was examined through Cronbach's alpha (0.834-0.869). The main analysis relied on descriptive statistics and a paired-samples t-test, complemented by confidence intervals and effect size estimation.

Results. Mathematics performance increased significantly from the pre-test (M = 5.85, SD = 3.03) to the post-test (M = 16.30, SD = 1.57), t(64) = 27.39, p < .001, with a very large effect size (dz = 3.40). The mean gain was 10.45 points. Satisfaction with Khan Academy was high when treated as a continuous 10-item scale (M = 47.69 out of 50, SD = 3.00), although satisfaction was not significantly associated with score gain.

Conclusions. Khan Academy was associated with substantial improvement in mathematics performance in this military higher education setting. Nevertheless, the findings should be interpreted cautiously because the design lacked a control group and the pre-test and post-test were not strictly parallel forms.

Practical application. The study offers empirical support for the structured integration of digital platforms into mathematics teaching in specialised higher education and provides an institutional model that may inform curricular innovation in comparable contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abreh, M. K., Arthur, F., Akwetey, F. A., & Nortey, S. A. (2025). Modelling STEM students’ intention to learn artificial intelligence (AI) in Ghana: A PLS-SEM and fsQCA approach. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), Article 223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00466-8

Amalric, M., Roveyaz, P., & Dehaene, S. (2023). Evaluating the impact of short educational videos on the cortical networks for mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(6), Article e2213430120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2213430120

Anggraini, A., Triyono, M. B., Sudira, P., & Syahbrudin, J. (2026). Bibliometric analysis: Trends and future directions of entrepreneurship learning models. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 9(1), Article e2026003. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2026003

Borchers, J., & da Cunha, M. S. (2025). School performance and inequality of opportunities in Latin America. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 86, Article 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101497

Egodage, U. K., Wijewickrama, C., Gunawardana, S., Basnayaka, A., & Dissanayake, B. (2025). Use of online resources to study physiology by preclinical medical students: An experience from a developing country. Advances in Physiology Education, 49(3), 742–748. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00061.2025

Fruett, F., Pereira Barbosa, F., Cardoso Zampolli Fraga, S., & Ivo Aragao Guimaraes, P. (2024). Empowering STEAM Activities with artificial intelligence and open hardware: The BitDogLab. IEEE Transactions on Education, 67(3), 462–471. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2024.3377555

Gleichmann, J., Kubitschke, H., & Schnauß, J. (2025). Impact of a mathematical pre-course on first-year physics students. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(3), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/16363

González-Rogado, A. B., Ramos-Gavilán, A. B., Rodríguez-Esteban, M. A., & Garcia-Holgado, A. (2025). Perception disparity between women and men on the gender gap in STEM at a Spanish university. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 20. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2024.3522255

Huang, J., Zhong, Y., & Chen, X. (2025). Adaptive and personalized learning in STEM education using high-performance computing and artificial intelligence. Journal of Supercomputing, 81, Article 981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-025-07481-7

Karimov, A., Nolte, A., Chounta, I.-A., Saarela, M., & Kärkkäinen, T. (2025). Improving learning experience through process re-engineering: Khan Academy localization into Azerbaijani. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1419362. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1419362

Lemos, C. C. dos S., Dias, L. O. F., Barbosa, P. S. de A., Marques, E. A. G., Ferraz, R. L., & Nalon, G. H. (2024). Digital tools used on the teaching-learning process in geotechnical engineering. Soils and Rocks, 47(2), Article e2024004923. https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.2024.004923

Li, C., & Yin, W. (2025). Interactive online learning method for students based on artificial intelligence. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), Article 201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00401-x

Ngu, P. N. H., Nam, N. D., Cuong, L. M., & Thao, T. T. P. (2025). Mathematical modelling in higher education: Evolving research and emerging trends (1980–2023). Infinity Journal, 14(2), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i2.p393-418

Ochogboju, A. O., & Díez-Palomar, J. (2025). Modeling concrete and virtual manipulatives for mathematics teacher training: A case study in ICT-enhanced pedagogies. Information, 16(8), Article 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16080698

Poesia, G., & Goodman, N. D. (2023). Peano: Learning formal mathematical reasoning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 381(2251), Article 20220044. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0044

Rueda-Gómez, K. L., Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. J., & Muñiz-Rodríguez, L. (2023). Performance and mathematical self-concept in university students using Khan Academy. Heliyon, 9(4), Article e15441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15441

Saracostti, M., Miranda, E., Guzmán, P., Schnettler, B., Concha-Salgado, A., de Toro, X., Lara, L., & Suazo, I. (2025). Exploring school engagement and academic outcomes over time: The role of contextual factors in Chile. Psychology in the Schools, 62(9), 3257–3272. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23538

Tosi, M. D. L., & Theobald, M. (2026). Online learning from data streams via decentralized and asynchronous SGD. Future Generation Computer Systems, 175, Article 108052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2025.108052

Traverso-Condori, L. C., Reyes-Arco, R. E., Reyes-Villalba, E., Torres-Gonzales, S. B., Maraza-Quispe, B., Tinco-Túpac, S. T., & Torres-Loayza, J. L. (2024). Evaluation of the impact of an online educational platform on the development of mathematical competencies in elementary school students. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias Del Aprendizaje, 19, 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2024.3465021

Wang, G., & Sun, F. (2025). A review of generative AI in digital education: Transforming learning, teaching, and assessment. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 26(19), 102–127. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICT.2025.146701

Weinhandl, R., Andic, B., Baldinger, S., Mayrhofer, J., & Helm, C. (2025). The ICAP model in the context of employing digital technologies for teaching mathematics: An analysis of teachers’ strategies to stimulate students’ cognitive Engagement moderated by age, gender and experience. Computers in the Schools, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2025.2544051

Yu, X., & Yang, D. (2024). The influence of mobile technology on STEM education student learning outcomes. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 18(20), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i20.50837

Zaidi, A., Barbareschi, G., Kunze, K., Pai, Y. S., & Yamaoka, J. (2025). TIEboard: A digital educational tool for kids geometric learning. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 9(2), Article 62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3729478

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Narváez Rios, M. M., Delgado Fernández, J. R., Mendoza Velazco, D. J. ., & Andrade Naranjo, D. S. (2026). The Khan Academy Platform in the Mathematics Learning Process in Military Training. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 17(1), 495-517. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.495.517