Exploring the Reticence of Thai University Students in English Classrooms: Student-centred Coping Strategies

Authors

  • Thinley Wangdi Research Center for Language Teaching and Learning, School of Languages and General Education, Walailak University, Walailak University 222 Thaiburi, Thasala, Nakhonsrithammarat, 80161, Thailand
  • Ringphami Shimray Prince of Songkla University International College (PSUIC), Prince of Songkla University Hatyai Campus, 15 Kanjavanich, Kohong, Hatyai- 90110, Songkhla, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.3.297.315

Keywords:

students’ reticence, cause of reticence, coping strategies, EFL context, Thailand

Abstract

Aim. This qualitative study explores the affective, cognitive, and behavioural factors influencing students' reticence in English language classrooms and subsequent potential coping strategies.

Methods. Data was collected from 472 Thai university students using open-ended questions and semi-structured interviews, and then thematically analysed.

Results. The findings revealed that students’ reticence is likely to be contributed by affective factors such as perceived lack of confidence, fear of peer judgment, shyness and anxiety, dislike of the English language, and lack of rapport with peers; cognitive factors like difficulty in understanding teachers’ questions, translating thoughts into English, and limited English proficiency; and behavioural factors such as teachers’ inappropriate approach. However, these factors could be reduced through effective collaboration among students (e.g., being mindful and seeking comfort in making mistakes), peers (e.g., supporting each other), and teachers (e.g., frequent encouragement, alternating between L1, positive reinforcement, and adopting a progressive questioning approach)

Conclusion. The study concludes with potential theoretical and practical implications in the field of foreign language education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Thinley Wangdi, Research Center for Language Teaching and Learning, School of Languages and General Education, Walailak University, Walailak University 222 Thaiburi, Thasala, Nakhonsrithammarat, 80161, Thailand

    Thinley Wangdi is an Assistant Professor at the School of Languages and General Education, Walailak University, Thailand. He is recognized as a Fellow by the UK’s Higher Education Academy (FHEA). His research interests include educational psychology, teacher education, and English language teaching. His recent publications have appeared in journals such as South Asia Research, TESL-EJ, and the Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development.

  • Ringphami Shimray, Prince of Songkla University International College (PSUIC), Prince of Songkla University Hatyai Campus, 15 Kanjavanich, Kohong, Hatyai- 90110, Songkhla, Thailand

    Ringphami Shimray is a lecturer at Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai Campus, Thailand. His research interests include ELT, teacher education and English language acquisition.

References

Ambele, E. A., & Boonsuk, Y. (2018). Silence of Thai students as a face-saving politeness strategy in a multicultural university context. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9(4), 221-231. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.16

Askari, N., & Moinzadeh, A. (2015). Iranian EFL faculty members’ attitude toward silent students. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2014.954

Bahar, B., Limbong, S., Yusmanizar, Y., Insan, A. N., & Fitriana, F. (2024). Students reluctance to speak is a result of teachers dominance and powerful in EFL Classrooms. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), 6(2), 1-11. https://repository.unifa.ac.id/id/eprint/950/

Banks, S. (2016). Behind Japanese students’ silence in English classrooms. Accents Asia, 8(2), 54-75. http://www.issues.accentsasia.org/issues/8-2/banks.pdf

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802-1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870

Bista, K. (2012). Silence in teaching and learning: Perspectives of a Nepalese graduate student. College Teaching, 60(2), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2011.633943

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carcary, M. (2020). The research audit trail: Methodological guidance for application in practice. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 18(2), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.18.2.008

Chaiyasat, C., & Intakaew, A. (2022). Why keep silent? Voices from Thai EFL students in an English-medium instruction university. Asian Englishes, 25(3), 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2022.2080426

Danckert, J., Mugon, J., Struk, A., & Eastwood, J. (2018). Boredom: What is it good for? In H. Lench (Ed.), The function of emotions (pp. 93-119). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-77619-4_6

Derakhshan, A., Kruk, M., Mehdizadeh, M., & Pawlak, M. (2021). Boredom in online classes in the Iranian EFL context: sources and solutions. System, 101, Article 102556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102556

Fen, F. S., Billy, L. S. A., Shing, S. R., & Nadarajan, N. T. M. (2020). Causes of undergraduate students' reticence in Malaysian ESL classrooms. Selangor Humaniora Review, 4(1), 1-14. https://share.journals.unisel.edu.my/ojs/index.php/share/article/view/119

Gangavarapu, S., K., Mutyala, U., and Chada, R., R., (2022). Investigating Indian ESL learners’ silent behaviour in response to oral tasks in online and offline classes. Journal of Silence Studies in Education, 1(2), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.31763/jsse.v1i2.24

Hanh, N. T. (2020). Silence Is Gold?: A study on students' silence in EFL classrooms. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(4), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n4p153

Harumi, S. (2011). Classroom silence: Voices from Japanese EFL learners. ELT Journal, 65(3), 260-269. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq046

Hongboontri, C., Wittaya, I., & Boonyaprakob, K. (2021). Silence in an EFL classroom: the interplay of Schwab’s four commonplaces. Suranaree Journal of Social Science, 15(1), 128-146. https://doi.org/10.55766/BHCD3404

Keaten, J. A., & Kelly, L. (2000). Reticence: An affirmation and revision. Communication Education, 49(2), 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520009379203

King, J. (2013). Silence in the second language classroom. Palgrave Macmillan.

Min, H. (2016). A study on silence phenomenon in college English classroom. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(6), 451-458. https://ijern.com/journal/2016/June-2016/39.pdf

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

Pawlak, M., Kruk, M., & Zawodniak, J. (2022). Investigating individual trajectories in experiencing boredom in the language classroom: The case of 11 Polish students of English. Language Teaching Research, 26(4), 598-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820914004

Phillips, G. M. (1984). Reticence: A perspective on social withdrawal. In J. A. Daly & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (pp. 51-66). Sage.

Purwanti, S. E., & Yeni, M. (2021). Students’ silence in speaking class: Factors and solutions: A descriptive study at eleventh-grade students of SMAN 1 and SMAN 2 Tembilahan Kota. Wiralodra English Journal (WEJ), 5(1), 10–19. https://wej.unwir.ac.id/index.php/wej/article/view/118

Rungwarapong, P. (2019). Factors affecting Thai students’ participation in dialogic talks in EFL classes: Students’ perspectives. Social Science Asia, 5(1), 12-21. http://164.115.28.46/nrctejournal/file_upload/digital_file/203_656fc.pdf

Shan, C. (2020). Classroom silence in college English class in China. Chinese and Foreign Languages: English Version, 18(5), 141-150. http://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/5f2386069074f.pdf

Shao, Q., & Gao, X. A. (2016). Reticence and willingness to communicate (WTC) of East Asian language learners. System, 63, 115-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.10.001

Shimray, R., & Wangdi, T. (2023). Multinational EFL teachers perspective of using L1 in the L2 classroom. MEXTESOL Journal, 47(2), 1-10. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1397160

Smith, L., & King, J. (2018). Silence in the foreign language classroom: The emotional challenges for L2 teachers. In J. Martínez Agudo (Ed.), Emotions in second language teaching (pp. 323-339). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-75438-3_18

Tatar, S. (2005). Classroom participation by international students: The case of Turkish graduate students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9(4), 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315305280967

Verma, S. (2017). Silence as discourse marker in multilingual classrooms in India. Language and Language Teaching, 6(2), 39-46. https://publications.azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/1924/

Waluyo, B., & Wangdi, T. (2024). Task-based language teaching in academic English higher education: A Case of low-proficiency learners in Thailand. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature® The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 30(3), 246-264. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2024-3003-17

Wang, M. (2019). Analysis of classroom silence in English class in Chinese universities. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2(1), 54-64. https://francis-press.com/uploads/papers/SEVraFJ4oacA2vSaqKprGJPnDngmij4lWIykzjoe.pdf

Wangdi, T., & Shimray, R. (2022a). Thai EFL school students' perceptions of using L1 in English language classrooms. Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(1), 257. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.1.17.257

Wangdi, T., & Shimray, R. (2022b). Qualities of effective EFL English teachers as perceived by Thai university students: A photovoice study. Issues in Educational Research, 32(2), 805-824. https://www.iier.org.au/iier32/wangdi.pdf

Wu, H. (2019). Reticence in the EFL classroom: voices from students in a Chinese university. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8(6), 114-125. https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJALEL/article/view/5945/4260

Xu, F., Yang, Y., Chen, J., & Zhu, A. X. (2022). Behind the silence of the professional classroom in universities: Formation of cognition-practice separation among university students — A grounded theory study in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), Article 14286. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114286

Zafarina, N. F. (2022). Silent learners’ voices: Exploring the silence behavior in Indonesian EFL classroom. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(2), 349-363. https://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i2.846

Zhou, Y., & Chen, Y. (2020). A study on reticence in college EFL classrooms: The role of diffusion of responsibility. English Language Teaching, 13(6), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n6p133

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23

How to Cite

Wangdi, T., & Shimray, R. . (2025). Exploring the Reticence of Thai University Students in English Classrooms: Student-centred Coping Strategies. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 16(2), 297-315. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.3.297.315