The LOHAS (Lifestyle of Health and Sustainability) Attitude Questionnaire for Assessing Sustainable Lifestyles Among University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2025.2.521.534Keywords:
environmental behaviour and attitudes, LOHAS typology, questionnaire validation, university students' lifestyle, sustainable education, consumer behaviourAbstract
Aim. This paper introduces the development, implementation, and pilot validation of the LOHAS Attitude Questionnaire. This instrument evaluates sustainable attitudes and behaviour among university students, based on the consumer typology model by the Natural Marketing Institute (NMI). The analysis explores the reliability and validity of the questionnaire and its capacity to identify distinct lifestyle groups and attitudes towards sustainability.
Methods. The LOHAS Attitude Questionnaire was developed through a comprehensive literature review, expert consultation, and iterative pilot testing. The pilot study involved 1,089 full-time university students across three Czech universities, representing various disciplines. Data collection employed a 40-question instrument, with responses captured on a Likert scale. Statistical analyses, including Cronbach’s alpha and factor analysis, were conducted using SPSS to determine reliability and to identify latent factors.
Results. The reliability analysis yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.881, indicating high internal consistency. Factor analysis identified five distinct components aligning with the NMI's typology: LOHAS, NATURALITES, DRIFTERS, CONVENTIONALS, and UNCONCERNEDS. Findings suggest the questionnaire effectively differentiates lifestyle groups and provides insights into students' attitudes towards sustainability.
Conclusion. The LOHAS Attitude Questionnaire proves to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing sustainable attitudes and behaviour among university students. It offers a robust framework for monitoring the impact of sustainability education and tailoring interventions based on lifestyle categories. Future research should expand its application to diverse cohorts and examine its role in fostering sustainable behaviour through targeted educational initiatives.
Downloads
References
Bishal, D., Prasanta, G., & Sen, S. (2023). Lifestyle of Health and Sustainability (LOHAS): A comparative study on undergraduate students. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 3(1), 32-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-13106
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford.
Brundtland, G. H., & World Commission on Environment and Development (Eds.) (1987), Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Oxford University Press.
Cheng, C. C., Chang, Y. Y., Tsai, M. C., Chen, C. T., & Tseng, Y. C. (2019). An evaluation instrument and strategy implications of service attributes in LOHAS restaurants. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(1), 194-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2017-0361
Choi, S., & Feinberg, R. A. (2021). The Lohas (Lifestyle of Health and Sustainability) scale development and validation. Sustainability, 13(4), 1598. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041598
Cowan, K., & Kinley, T. (2014). Green spirit: consumer empathies for green apparel. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(5), 493-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12125
Das, B. (2023). Application Of Mahalanobis Distance as a measure on lifestyle of health and sustainability and its components. The Social Science Review a Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(1), 44-52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375450238_
APPLICATION_OF_MAHALANOBIS_DISTANCE_AS_A_MEASURE_ON_LIFESTYLE_OF_HEALTH_AND_SUSTAINABILITY_AND_ITS_COMPONENTS
Das, B., Mahato, S., & Gayen, P. (2024). Lifestyles of health and sustainability (LOHAS): Differentiating relationships in regard to stream of study. The Social Science Review: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(1), 1-13.
Edwards, A. A., Joyner, K. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2021). A simulation study on the performance of different reliability estimation methods. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(6), 1089-1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164421994184
Golestan, S., & Abdullah, H. B. (2015). Self-efficacy as a moderator in the relationship between peer pressure and family smoking, and adolescent cigarette smoking behavior. Asian Social Science, 11(28), 84-97. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n28p84
Gössling, S., & Dolnicar, S. (2022). A review of air travel behavior and climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.802
Häyrinen, L., Mattila, O., Berghäll, S., & Toppinen, A. (2016). Lifestyle of health and sustainability of forest owners as an indicator of multiple use of forests. Forest Policy and Economics, 67, 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.005
Janse, R. J., Hoekstra, T., Jager, K. J., Zoccali, C., Tripepi, G., Dekker, F. W., & van Diepen, M. (2021). Conducting correlation analysis: Important limitations and pitfalls. Clinical Kidney Journal, 14(11), 2332-2337. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfab085
Kim, Y. B. (2015). Ulinaladaehagsaeng-uiheub-yeonhaengdong-gwahwangyeong-yoin, geongangsaenghwalsilcheongan-uigwanlyeonseong [Association with smoking behavior, environmental factors and health promoting lifestyle among Korean university students]. Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion, 32(2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.14367/kjhep.2015.32.2.15
Matos, D. A. S., & Rodrigues, E. A. (2019). Análise Fatorial. Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP). http://repositorio.enap.gov.br/handle/1/4790
Natural Marketing Institute. (2008). Understanding the TM LOHAS Market Report Consumer insights into the role of sustainability, health, the environment and social responsibility (6th ed.). https://www.lohas.se/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Understanding-the-LOHAS-Consumer-11_LOHAS_Whole_Foods_Version.pdf
Park, H. H. (2015). The influence of LOHAS consumption tendency and perceived consumer effectiveness on trust and purchase intention regarding upcycling fashion goods. International Journal of Human Ecology, 16(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.6115/ijhe.2015.16.1.37
Pícha, K., & Navrátil, J. (2019). The factors of Lifestyle of Health and Sustainability influencing pro-environmental buying behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.072
Ray, P. H., & Anderson, S. H. (2001). The cultural creatives: How 50 million people are changing the world. Three Rivers Press.
Stadler, M., Sailer, M., & Fischer, F. (2021). Knowledge as a formative construct: A good alpha is not always better. New Ideas in Psychology, 60, Article 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100832
Szakály, Z., Popp, J., Kontor, E., Kovács, S., Pető, K., & Jasák, H. (2017). Attitudes of the Lifestyle of Health and Sustainability Segment in Hungary. Sustainability, 9(10), Article 1763. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101763
Uzule, K., Gobniece, Z., & Titko, J. (2024). Digital transformation of economies through technology, education and competences. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(5), 758-774. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.758
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kateřina Jančaříková, Linda Brůnová, Zuzana Huňková, Guilherme Stecca Marcom, Silvie Svobodová, Antonín Jančařík
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
