Psychological Patterns in Sexual Relationships: Ukrainian Adaptation of the Multidimensional Sexual Questionnaire


  • Anastasiia Shyroka Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ukrainian Catholic University 17 Ilariona Svientsitskoho St., Lviv, 79000, Ukraine
  • Tetiana Zavada Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ukrainian Catholic University 17 Ilariona Svientsitskoho St., Lviv, 79000, Ukraine



sexuality, Ukrainian-language adaptation, reliability, validity, psychological tendencies, sexual relationships


Aim. Human sexuality is an important multidimensional subject for psychological research. However, the study of sexuality remains relatively closed for Ukrainian researchers, primarily due to a lack of valid and reliable measures of sexuality in general, and in particular, measures of psychological patterns in human sexuality. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to validate a self-report English-language tool, the Multidimensional Sexual Questionnaire (MSQ), for the Ukrainian language.

Methods. A total of 1113 Ukrainian-speaking participants were administered the MSQ-UA. The MSQ-UA factor structure was measured using EFA and CFA procedures. Alpha and Omega estimates of internal consistency were calculated. The test-retest reliability was established in a five-week time period. The correlations of the MSQ-UA subscales with relevant psychopathology, personality measures and control statements were accomplished to prove the construct validity of the questionnaire.

Results. Findings indicated that the MSQ-UA is an eleven-dimensional measure, which is almost identical to the original English-language version. Subscales of the MSQ-UA display acceptable excellent psychometric properties of internal consistency (Alpha and Omega within a range of 0.70 to 0.92). The test-retest reliability over the five-week period was appropriate (r=0.68-0.93). The MSQ-UA subscales demonstrated from moderate to high correlations with relevant measures, and the associations were absent or low in cases when criterion measures were irrelevant to the subscale.

Conclusion. The MSQ-UA demonstrated appropriate psychometric properties and may be applied to assess a broad range of psychological patterns in sexual relationships in the Ukrainian-speaking population.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Anastasiia Shyroka, Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ukrainian Catholic University 17 Ilariona Svientsitskoho St., Lviv, 79000, Ukraine

    Ph.D., associate professor of Psychology and Psychotherapy department, Ukrainian Catholic University

  • Tetiana Zavada, Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ukrainian Catholic University 17 Ilariona Svientsitskoho St., Lviv, 79000, Ukraine

    Ph.D., senior lecturer of Psychology and Psychotherapy department, Ukrainian Catholic University


Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186-3191.

Bernaards, C. A., & Jennrich, R. I. (2005). Gradient projection algorithms and software for arbitrary rotation criteria in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 676-696.

Brenk-Franz, K., & Strauß, B. (2011). Der multidimensionale fragebogen zur sexualität (MFS): Erste evaluation der deutschsprachigen version des multidimensional sexuality questionnaire (MSQ) [A preliminary evaluation of the German language version of the Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire (MSQ)]. Zeitschrift Für Sexualforschung, 24(3), 256-271.

Clancy, E. M., Howard, D., Chong, S., & Klettke, B. (2021). Dream it, do it? Associations between pornography use, risky sexual behaviour, sexual preoccupation and sexting behaviours among young Australian adults. Sexes, 2(4), 433-444.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

Eleuteri, S., Saladino, V., & Verrastro, V. (2017). Identity, relationships, sexuality, and risky behaviors of adolescents in the context of social media. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 32(3-4), 354-365.

Forbes, M. K., Eaton, N. R., & Krueger, R. F. (2017). Sexual qquality of life and aging: A prospective study of a nationally representative sample. The Journal of Sex Research, 54(2), 137-148.

Fredriksen-Goldsen, K. I., & Kim, H. J. (2017). The science of conducting research with LGBT older adults – an introduction to aging with pride: National Health, Aging, and Sexuality/Gender study (NHAS). The Gerontologist, 57(1), S1–S14.

Grammer, K., Renninger, L., & Fischer, B. (2004). Disco clothing, female sexual motivation, and relationship status: Is she dressed to impress? The Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 66-74.

Gravel, E. E., Pelletier, L. G., & Reissing, E. D. (2016). “Doing it” for the right reasons: Validation of a measurement of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and a motivation for sexual relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 164-173.

Horbal, I. S. (2016). Social’no-psykholohichni chynnyky sub’iektyvnoho blahopoluchchia pensioneriv [Socio-psychological factors of subjective well-being of pensioners] [Doctoral dissertation, Institute for Social and Political Psychology NAPS of Ukraine]. Institute for Social and Political Psychology NAPS of Ukraine Research Repository.

International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests.

Ismail-Pratt, I. S., Bikoo, M., Liao, L.-M., Conway, G. S., & Creighton, S. M. (2007). Normalization of the vagina by dilator treatment alone in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Human Reproduction, 22(7), 2020–2024.

Jacobson, R., & Joel, D. (2018). Self-reported gender identity and sexuality in an online sample of cisgender, transgender, and gender-diverse individuals: An exploratory study. The Journal of Sex Research, 56(2), 249-263.

Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y. (2021). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modelling. R package version 0.5-5.

Khomulenko, T., Kramchenkova, V., Turkova, D., Lesnichenko, D., & Myronovych, B. (2020). Metodyka diagnostyky tilesnoho lokusu kontroliu [The Measurement of the bodily-related locus of control]. Psychology, 62, 293-316.

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of general internal medicine, 16(9), 606-613.

Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., Umphress, V., Lunnen, K., Okiishi, J., Burlingame, G. M., & Reisinger, C. W. (1996). Administration and scoring manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ–45.2). American Professional Credentialing Services.

Lehmiller, J. J., Garcia, J. R., Gesselman, A. N., & Mark, K. P. (2020). Less sex, but more sexual diversity: Changes in sexual behavior during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Leisure Sciences, 43(1), 295-304.

Li, C. H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369-387.

Maas, M. K., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2015). Sexual esteem in emerging adulthood: Associations with sexual behavior, contraception use, and romantic relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(7), 795-806.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modelling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.

Maier, M. J. (2015). Companion package to the book “R: Einführung durch angewandte Statistik”.

Muzalevska, A. (2021). Ukrainomovna adaptatsiia testu "The Multidimentional Sexuality Questionnaire (MSQ)" [Ukrainian adaptation of ”The Multidimentional Sexuality Questionnaire (MSQ)”] [ Master's thesis, Ukrainian Catholic University]. Ukrainian Catholic University Research Repository.

Ochnik, D. (2016). Życie w pojedynkę: psychospołeczne konsekwencje bycia singlem u kobiet i mężczyzn [Living alone: The psychosocial consequences of being single women and men]. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Silesia in Katowice]. University of Silesia in Katowice Research Repository.

Parker, R. G. (2009). Sexuality, culture and society: shifting paradigms in sexuality research. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11(3), 251-266.

Porter, L. D., Yarden, R., Newcomer, K. L., & Fathi, N. (2021). Young-onset colorectal cancer treatment side effects: Infertility, sexual dysfunction, and quality-of-life outcomes. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 39(15), 3587-3587.

Revelle, W. (2021). Psych: procedures for psychological, psychometric and personality research. Northwestern University.

Rosseel, Y. (2012). “lavaan: An R package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36.

Schover, L. R., Van Der Kaaij, M., Van Dorst, E., Creutzberg C., Huyghe, E., & Kiserud, C. (2014). Sexual dysfunction and infertility as late effects of cancer treatment. European Journal of Cancer Supplements, 12, 41-53.

Sepehrian Azar, F., & Sorbi, M. H. (2018). Psychometric features of a Multidimensional Sexual Questionnaire for Iranian men and women. Sexuality & Culture, 22(3), 894-908.

Shyroka, A., & Mykolaychuk, M. (2020). Adaptatsiia ukrainomovnoi versii opytuval’nyka reultatyvnosti psykhoterapii OQ-45: validnist’ ta nadiinist’ [Ukrainian adaptation of the efficacy of psychotherapy questionnaire OQ-45: validity and reliability]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersons’koho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia “Psykholohichni nauky,” 3, 201-213.

Snell, W. E., Jr., Fisher T. D., & Miller, R. (1991). Development of the Sexual Awareness Questionnaire: Components, reliability, and validity. Annals of Sex Research, 4, 65-92.

Snell, W. E., Jr., Fisher, T. D., & Walters, A. S. (1993). The Multidimensional Sexuality Questionnaire: An objective self-report measure of psychological tendencies associated with human sexuality. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 27-55.

Snell, W. E., Jr., & Papini, D. R. (1989). The sexuality scale: An instrument to measure sexual-esteem, sexual-depression, and sexual-preoccupation. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 256-263.

Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of internal medicine, 166(10), 1092-1097.

Tao, P., Coates, R., Zhao, Y., & Maycock, B. (2012). The effects of translating the multidimensional sexuality questionnaire from English to Mandarin: A test of reliability and validity. Sexual Health, 9(4), 304-313.

WMA. (2008, October). WMA declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principle for medical research involving human subjects. 59th WMA General Assembly.

World Health Organization. (2006). Defining sexual health: Report of a technical consultation on sexual health, 28–31 January 2002. WHO Press.

Zeanah, P. D., & Schwarz, C. (1996). Reliability and validity of the Sexual Self-Esteem Inventory for women. Assessment, 3(1), 1-15.




How to Cite

Shyroka, A., & Zavada, T. (2022). Psychological Patterns in Sexual Relationships: Ukrainian Adaptation of the Multidimensional Sexual Questionnaire . Journal of Education Culture and Society, 13(2), 431-454.