AI as the Philosophy of a Matrix Society. Educational Implications

Authors

  • Aleksander Kobylarek University of Wrocław, Institute of Pedagogy, ul. Dawida 1/3
  • Jana Birova Faculty of Education, Department of French Language and Literature Charles University in Prague Magdalény Rettigové 4, 116 39 Praha 1, Czech Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.9.18

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, AI, practical philosophy, posthuman society, values, simulacrum

Abstract

Rapid technological development requires us to continually expand our knowledge and acquire skills that will help us  to not only function in society in general but also interpret messages and meanings correctly. Self-development helps us to  distance ourselves from untruths, think independently, become  informed citizens and easily distinguish truth from falsehood. Primarily, Artificial Intelligence (AI) was made to support humans, yet in their lives, it has come to  play a different  role. It takes  thinking out of their hands, that is comfortable, but it  also uses multiple, also unreliable sources. AI has become a discussion (and not only a discussion) but also a   partner, a doctor, a lawyer, an oracle. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is coming to be a fast ,but often also unreliable assistant and  adapted to users’ preferences and views, provides users with information and materials. This user places too much trust in AI and becomes complacent, knowing that they do not have to make any effort to get what they want or need. Educators now face an extremely difficult task of restoring younger generations’ faith in the meaning of science, independence, honesty, and critical thinking. The task is made even more difficult by the fact that the highest offices are held by people who display crassness and a lack of elementary knowledge, thus showing that it’s not worth being an honest and hardworking person. Nevertheless, this rapid development and human laziness prove that the topic of AI should still be explored by scientists from different disciplines, and that countries should ensure that appropriate regulations are in place to guarantee the safety of users. Especially as its rapid development affects not only younger generations but also people of all ages and at all levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Aleksander Kobylarek, University of Wrocław, Institute of Pedagogy, ul. Dawida 1/3

    PhD in humanities, assistant professor at the University of Wrocław (Poland) in Departament of Pedagogy, manager of the University of the Third Age in the University of Wrocław up to 2016, author of more than 100 scientific publications, including articles, books, chapters, editor-in-chief of international scientific "Journal of Education Culture and Society" and "Ogrody Nauk i Sztuk (Gardens of Science and Arts).

References

Akimjak, A., Kralik, R., & Stan, L. (2025). Betting on God today. European Journal of Science and Theology, 21(5), 65–77.

Alam, S. (2025a). Impact of mobile-facilitated peer feedback platform on improving the accuracy of spoken English: An experimental study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(2), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.2.2234

Alam, S. (2025b). Measuring the effects of mobile and social networking technology on enhancing English language skills: A comparative study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 19(01), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v19i01.51427

Alam, S., Amir, Saudi, T. T., Ahmad, F., Kralik, R., Rasheed, T. (2026a). Impact of Meta AI-generated corrective feedback in the writing classroom: effects on L2 writing linguistic errors. World Journal of English Language, 16(3), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v16n3p119.

Alam, S., Ahmad, F., Mohamed, A. O., Dawood, J. A., Obloberdiyevna, D. S., & Rasheed, T. (2026b). Artificial intelligence in Saudi English language classrooms: A narrative review. World Journal of English Language, 16(5), 254. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v16n5p254

Applebaum, A. (2020). Twilight of democracy: The seductive lure of authoritarianism. Doubleday.

Atamhenwan, L. (2026). How are combinations of human-written words and LLM-generated words by ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini and Grammarly detected by Turnitin? Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-026-14049-2

Baran, B. (2003). Postmodernizm i końce wieku [Postmodernism and the end of the century]. Inter Esse.

Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation (the body, in theory: Histories of cultural materialism). University of Michigan Press.

Bernstein, B. (1977). Class, codes and control. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Dąbrowska, U., Krasnodębska, U., Kuś, J., Plichta, P., Pyżalski, J., Rogowiecki, J., & Witkowska, M. (2026). AI w szkole od algorytmu do relacji [AI at school from algorithms to relations]. NASK – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy.

Eliade, M. (1959). Sacred and the profane. Elsevier Australia.

Fan, Y., Tang, L., Le, H., Shen, K., Tan, S., Zhao, Y., Shen, Y., Li, X., & Gašević, D. (2025). Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56, 489–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544

Fukuyama, F. (1993). The end of history and the last man . Avon Books.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.

Grab, M. O. (2026). Teaching for equity: An exploration of AI's role in culturally responsive teaching in higher education settings. Innovative Higher Education, 51, 859–880. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-025-09801-4

Jashapara, A. (2004). Knowledge management: An integrated approach. Pearson Education.

Krimsky, S. (2003). Science in the private interest. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Łabuz, M. (2026). Przed waszą erą. Człowiek w syntetycznym świecie deepfake'ów, ChataGPT i sztucznej inteligencji [Before your era. Man in a synthetic world of deepfakes, ChatGPT and artificial intelligence]. Filia.

Mahrik, T., & Kralik, R. (2026). Narcissism, man and God. International Scientific Board of Catholic Researchers and Teachers in Ireland (ISBCRTI).

Martín, J. G., Rojas, A. M., & Kralik, R. (2021). The Kantian ethical perspective seen from the existential philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard's Victor Eremita. Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 11(1–2), 48–57.

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1930). La rebelión de las masas. Revista de Occidente.

Pavlikova, M. (2018). Kierkegaard’s understanding of man and society. XLinguae, 11(1), 323–331.

Roubalova, M., & Kralik, R. (2026). Četba hebrejského textu Tanachu (I. díl) – Josefův konflikt s bratry a Judův odchod z rodinného kontextu v rabínské tradici (Reading the Hebrew text of the Tanakh, Vol. 1 – Joseph’s conflict with his brothers and Judah’s departure from the family context in rabbinic tradition). Verbum.

Slowiak, J., & Cuesta, J. (2018). Jerzy Grotowski. Taylor & Francis Inc.

Stan, L., & Pavlikova, M. (2026). Kierkegaard for the 21st century: Essays on aesthetics, ethics, religion, and politics. Kierkegaard Circle.

Znaniecki, F. (1965). Social relations and social roles: The unfinished systematic sociology. Chandler Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Kobylarek, A., & Birova, J. . (2026). AI as the Philosophy of a Matrix Society. Educational Implications. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 17(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.9.18