The Impact of Digital Technologies on Adolescents’ Learning Motivation in Latvia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2026.1.433.451Keywords:
adolescents, digital competence, digital learning motivation, educational technologiesAbstract
Aim. The study aims to investigate the impact of digital technologies on adolescents’ learning motivation in Latvia, focusing on usage patterns, perceived benefits and drawbacks, and the role of teachers’ digital competence.
Methods. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was analysed was conducted in May 2025 with 477 students in grades 4–9 from Latvian general education schools. Data was collected via a 20-item questionnaire including dichotomous, multiple-choice, Likert-scale items, and open-ended questions. Quantitative data using descriptive statistics (percentages, distributions), while qualitative suggestions was thematically summarised.
Results. Digital technologies significantly enhance motivation, with 86.6% of students enjoying device-based learning and 85.1% having used artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Key benefits include increased engagement (19.3%), autonomy (16.9%), and easier comprehension (16.8%), while drawbacks involve eye strain (22.1%), internet disruptions (21.8%), and distractions (15.4%). Teachers’ digital skills were rated positively by 55.8%, though 53% believe improvements are needed.
Conclusions. The positive impact of digital technologies on learning motivation depends on teachers’ skills and the balanced, pedagogically grounded integration of technologies.
Practical application. Findings inform policy on teacher training, infrastructure investment, and digital well-being measures in Latvian schools, supporting School2030 initiatives.
Cognitive value. This is one of the first large-scale empirical studies in Latvia specifically examining adolescents’ perspectives on digital motivation in the post-COVID period, providing Baltic regional insights and student-driven recommendations for evidence-based digital education strategies.
Downloads
References
Alberts, L., Lyngs, U., & Lukoff, K. (2024). Designing for sustained motivation: A review of self-determination theory in behaviour change technologies. Interacting with Computers, 38(3), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwae040
Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B.-B., & Essel, D. D. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practices. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1541031. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031
Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Applying self-determination theory to online learning: The mediating effect of autonomy support on engagement. Computers & Education, 183, Article 104495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104495
Dauksiene, E., Trepule, E., & Volungeviciene, A. (2021). Digital competence improvement by Lithuanian school teachers during COVID-19. In EDEN Conference Proceedings (pp. 213–222). https://doi.org/10.38069/edenconf-2021-ac0021
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Deemer, E.D., Barr, A.C., Belote, A., Hall, M. C., Xu, C., Ogas, J.P. (2023). Online science instruction can promote adolescents’ autonomy need satisfaction: A latent growth curve analysis. Research in Science Education, 53, 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10118-5
Ertan, E., & Kocadere, S. A. (2022). Gamification in online learning environments: A systematic review (2011–2021). Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 7(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1020044
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M.A., Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
He, J., Wang, Q., & Lee, H. (2025). Enhancing online learning engagement: Teacher support, psychological needs satisfaction and interaction. BMC Psychology, 13, Article 696. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03016-0
IT Izglītības fonds. (2025, April). Latvijas pedagogu digitālo prasmju pašnovērtējums. https://cilvecigipartehnologijam.lv/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/PARSKATS_Latvijas-pedagogu-digitalo-prasmju-pasnovertejums.pdf
Li, L., Hew, K. F., & Du, J. (2024). Gamification enhances student intrinsic motivation, perceptions of autonomy and relatedness, but minimal impact on competency: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 765–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10337-7
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people, and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335
Nordregio. (2024). Monitoring digital inclusion in the Nordic and Baltic region (Discussion paper). Nordregio. https://nordregio.org/app//uploads/2024/01/monitoring-digital-inclusion-in-the-nordic-and-baltic-region.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Digitalizācija Latvijā [Digitalisation in Latvia]. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a58d1c1a-lv
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). Impact of digital tools on student learning: Strong pedagogy, teacher training imperative. https://www.policyedge.in/p/oecd-report-reviews-impact-of-digital
Petrovica, S., Anohina-Naumeca, A. & Avanesova, J. (2022). The impact of digitalisation of higher education: The case of Latvia and Nordic-Baltic region. Applied Computer Systems, 27(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.2478/acss-2022-0003
Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F., & Salikhova, A. B. (2020). Psychological aspects of digital learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), Article ep280. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584
Seema, R., Heidmets, M., Valk, A., & Vainik, U. (2023). Students’ digital addiction and learning difficulties. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1191817. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1191817
Shank, E., Tang, H., & Morris, W. (2025). Motivation in online course design using self-determination theory: An action research study in a secondary mathematics course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10410-9
Smahel, D., Šaradín Lebedíková, M., Lacko, D., Kvardová, N., Mýlek, V., Tkaczyk, M., Švestková, A., Gulec, H., Hrdina, M., Macháčková, H., & Dědková, L. (2025). Tech & teens: Insights from 15 studies on the impact of digital technology on well-being. EU Kids Online, London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.g4asyqkcrum7
Stalmach, A., Reinck, C., D’Elia, P., Kucinschi, A., Scheiter, K., & Stürmer, K. (2025). A conceptual impact model of digital support for student self-regulation and emotion regulation grounded in self-determination theory. Discover Education, 4, Article 383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00825-8
Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. (2021). Digitālās transformācijas pamatnostādnes 2021.–2027. gadam [Digital Transformation Guidelines 2021–2027]. https://www.varam.gov.lv/sites/varam/files/content/files/digitalas-transformacijas-pamatnostadnes-_2021-27.pdf
Topping, K., Douglas, W., Robertson, D., & Ferguson, N. (2022). Effectiveness of online and blended learning from schools: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(2), Article e3353. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3353
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4020460?v=pdf
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2017). The state of the world’s children 2017: Children in a digital world. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/media/48581/file/SOWC_2017_ENG.pdf
Usca, S., Dzerviniks, J., Lubkina, V., Vindece, A., & Poplavskis, J. (2021). Development of teachers’ digital competence: Problems and solutions in Latvia. Rural Environment. Education. Personality, 14, 327-333. https://doi.org/10.22616/REEP.2021.14.036
Wang, A. I., & Tahir, R. (2020). The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review. Computers & Education, 149, Article 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103818
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kristine Sile, Daina Vasilevska

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.

