Efficacy of Mixed Model Instruction to Improve English Language Skills of Business Management Students: An Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.2.387.402Keywords:
technology-based instructions, communicative language teaching, language skills, mixed model instruction, blended learningAbstract
Aim. The current study explored and compared the efficacy of technology-based instructions, specifically web-mediated, blended, and online instructions, on the enhancement of English language skills among students pursuing Business management (BM) in Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.
Method. A total of two hundred and four participants were chosen randomly and divided into four groups. The control group, comprising 51 individuals, received general English instruction utilizing the communicative language teaching (CLT) approach, and engaged in exercises that focused on developing their general English skills. On the other hand, the web-mediated learning experimental group, also consisting of 51 participants, received general English instruction through the Duolingo educational model. Similarly, the blended experimental group, comprised of 51 individuals, received general English instruction through the Enriched Virtual Blended Learning Model. Lastly, the online learning group, consisting of 51 participants, received general English instruction through the LMS instructional model.
Results. Prior to the intervention, all students underwent a pretest, and subsequently, a posttest and a delayed posttest were administered to evaluate their proficiency in standard general English, as measured by the TOEFL exam. The study's results indicated that all groups displayed progress in their English language skills. However, the Duolingo and Enriched Virtual learning models demonstrated superior performance in enhancing English language skills compared to the other groups.
Conclusion. These findings hold significant pedagogical implications for curriculum designers, the development of training programs for future HR professionals, material producers, and all stakeholders involved in the field of BM education.
Downloads
References
Alam, S., Albozeidi, H. F., Al-Hawamdeh, B. O. S., & Ahmad, F. (2022). Practice and principle of blended learning in ESL/EFL pedagogy: Strategies, techniques and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(11), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i11.29901
Alam, S., Usama, M., Hameed, A., Iliyas, S. (2024). Analysing Facebook mobile usage: efficacy and ESL learners’ writing proficiency. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 18(3), pp. 60–74. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i03.44959
Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, K. K. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: A review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232-238. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1002.03
Alipour, P. (2020). A Comparative Study of Online Vs. Blended Learning on Vocabulary Development Among Intermediate EFL Learners. Cogent Education, 7(1), Article 1857489. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2020.1857489
Ayse, D. I. (2018). Use of technology in constructivist approach. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(21), 704–711. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2018.3609
Azizi, M. & Kralik, R. (2020). Incorporating mindfulness into EFL literature courses to foster critical reading ability. Education and Self Development, 15(4), 21–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.26907/esd15.4.06
Azizi, M., Pavlíková, M., & Masalimova, A. R. (2020). Exploring literature reading classes in terms of types of feedback provided by EFL teachers: Does teaching experience play a determining role? Education and Self Development, 15(3), 19–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.26907/esd15.3.02
Azizi, M., Pavlikova, M., Slobodova Novakova, K., & Baghana, J. (2021). The differential effects of dynamic assessment versus coded focused feedback on the process writing of EFL learners. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(2), 273-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.2.273
Azizi, M., Tkáčová, H, Pavlikova, M., & Jenisova, Z. (2020). Extensive reading and the writing ability of EFL learners: The effect of group work. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(4), 726-739. http://dx.doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2020.4.726
Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), Article em0060. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937
Bataineh, K. B., & Atoum, M. S. (2021). A silver lining of Coronavirus: Jordanian universities turn to distance education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 17(2), 138-148.
Chang, S., & Tharenou, P. (2004). Competencies needed for managing a multicultural workgroup. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 42(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411104041534
Choi, J., & Yi, Y. (2015). Teachers’ integration of multimodality into classroom practices for English language learners. TESOL Journal, 7(2), 304–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.204
Clark, T., & Barbour, M. (Eds.). (2023). Online, Blended, and Distance Education in Schools. Taylor & Francis.
Conole, G. (2014). The use of technology in distance education. In T. Anderson & D. Wiley (Eds.) Online distance education (pp. 217-236). Towards a research agenda. AU Press.
Doolittle, P. E., & Hicks, D. (2003). Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the use of technology in social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 31(1), 72–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2003.10473216
Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (Eds.). (2013). Constructivism and the technology of instruction. Routledge.
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018). An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL Learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5-6), 617–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757
Gilakjan, A. P., Leong, L. M., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Teachers’ use of technology and constructivism. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 5(4), 49–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2013.04.07
Gillett-Swan, J. (2017). The challenges of online learning: Supporting and engaging the isolated learner. Journal of Learning Design, 10(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.293
Hosseinpour, N., Biria, R., & Rezvani, E. (2019). Promoting academic writing proficiency of Iranian EFL learners through blended learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.640525
Kawinkoonlasate, P. (2019). Integration in flipped classroom technology approach to develop English language skills of Thai EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 12(11), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n11p23
Khonamri, F., Azizi, M., & Králik, R. (2020). Using interactive e-based flipped learning to enhance EFL literature students’ critical reading. Science for Education Today, 10(1), 25–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2685-6762.2001.02
Khonamri, F., Azizi, N., Akimjak, A., & Kurilenko, V. (2024). The prospects of reading circles for fostering EFL learners’ motivation to read and engagement. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(1), 403-418. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.403.418
Khonamri, F., Hashemi, E., Pavlikova, M., & Petrasova, B. (2021). Coherence problems of EFL students’ writing in light of the Gricean maxims. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(2), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.2.294.313
Khonamri, F., Králik, R., Vítečková, M., & Petrikovičová, L. (2021). Self-assessment and EFL literature students’ oral reproduction of short stories. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(1), 77–88. www.doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.1.77
Khonamri, F., Pavlíková, M., Ansari, F., Sokolova, N. L., Korzhuev A. V., & Rudakova, E. (2020). The impact of collaborative instruction of language learning strategies on language learning beliefs and learner autonomy. Xlinguae, 15(4), 216-234. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2020.13.04.16
Kobylarek, A. (2021). Post-pandemic challenges for learning communities. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.1.5.11
Kobylarek, A., Alaverdov, E., & Jakubowska, L. (2021). The significance of a pandemic in teaching foreign languages, with special regard to the teaching of seniors. XLinguae, 14(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.18355/xl.2021.14.01.06
Le, T., Ly Thi Tran, & Mai Tuyet Ngo. (2023). English language education for graduate employability in Vietnam. Springer Nature.
Li, L. (2014). Understanding language teachers’ practice with educational technology: A case from China. System, 46, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.016
Li, M., & Campbell, J. (2009). Accessing Employment: Challenges Faced by Non-Native English-Speaking Professional Migrants. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 18(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719680901800303
Mahmoudi, M. (2020). The effect of online learning on grammatical accuracy among EFL upper-intermediate learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(6), 1011-1016. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1106.20
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of community psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course “forced” online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205
Nugroho, A. D. (2020). How E-Learning Deals with Higher Education during the Pandemic in Indonesia. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 13(2), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.32678/loquen.v13i2.3555
Oweis, T. I. (2018). Effects of using a blended learning method on students’ achievement and motivation to learn English in Jordan: A pilot case study. Education Research International, 2018, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7425924
Owston, R. D. (1997). Research news and Comment: The World Wide Web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning? Educational Researcher, 26(2), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x026002027
Permana, Y. G. (2017). The effect of using blended learning strategy toward the 8 grade students’ writing competency. Journal of Psychology and Instructions, 1(2), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpai.v1i2.10363
Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2013). Blended Learning. Research perspectives (Vol. 2). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880310
Prawat, R. S., & Floden, R. E. (1994). Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of learning. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2901_4
Rahayu, R. A. P. (2021). Effect of collaborative writing combined with blog online learning on Indonesian EFL learners’ writing skill across motivation. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 2(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v2i01.219
Roshid, M. M., & Kankaanranta, A. (2023). English communication skills in international business: Industry expectations versus university preparation. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231184814
Russell, M. (2018). Recent Advances in the Accessibility of Digitally Delivered Educational Assessments. In S. Elliott, R. Kettler, P. Beddow, & A. Kurz, (Eds.), Handbook of Accessible Instruction and Testing Practices (pp. 237-262). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71126-3_16
Schutte, N., Barkhuizen, N., & van der Sluis, L. (2016). The development of a human resource management (HRM) professional competence model: A pilot study. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 26(3), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2016.1185902
Senffner, D., & Kepler, L. G. (2015). Blended learning that works. ATD Press.
Shmeleva, Z. (2020). Professionally-oriented teaching of a foreign language for future human resource managers at the Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM (Vol. 20, pp. 845-850). https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2020/5.2/s22.104
Shooli, E., Esfahani, F. R., & Sepehri, M. (2021). Impacts of flipped classroom on micro/macro writing subskills in Iranian EFL context. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(4), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2020.13367.1649
Smyth, S., Houghton, C., Cooney, A., & Casey, D. (2012). Students’ experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes. Nurse Education Today, 32(4), 464–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014
Usama, M. (2023). Does blended learning approach affect madrasa students English writing errors? A comparative study. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 10(3), 097-108. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.103.10
Usama, M., Alam, S., Tarai, S., & Banu, S. (2024b). The impact of rotation model on minimizing inflectional morphemes errors in English writing: a comparative study of error analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(2), 307-318.
Usama. M, Alam. S, Hameed, A., Ahmad. F., & Iliyas., S. (2024a). Web-based vs. mixed mode instruction utilizing e-learning via LMS: A comparative study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14(4), 612-619.
Wen, X., & Walters, S. M. (2022). The impact of technology on students’ writing performances in elementary classrooms: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education Open, 3, Article 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100082
Yamao, S., & Sekiguchi, T. (2015). Employee commitment to corporate globalization: The role of English language proficiency and human resource practices. Journal of World Business, 50(1), 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.03.001
Zakirova, E. S., Samorodova, E. A., & Kobylarek, A. (2022). Analysis of lexico-semantic and stylistic means of expressing verb tense in Russian and English. XLinguae, 15(3), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.18355/xl.2022.15.03.08
Zhang, W., & Zhu, C. (2018). Impact of blended learning on university students’ achievement of English as a second language. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(2), 251–273. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/171512/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sohaib Alam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
