Educators' Perspectives on Grade Inflation, Motivational Grading, And Emotional Responses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.2.223.236Keywords:
educators' perspectives, grade inflation, motivational grading, emotional responsesAbstract
Aim. This study investigates the multifaceted nature of grading within the Albanian educational system, aiming to comprehend its complexities and impact on educators. It focuses on grade inflation, motivating grading practices, and educators' emotional responses, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods. The research addresses educators' perceptions of grade inflation, strategies for motivating grades, and emotional experiences in assigning end-of-semester grades. Quantitative analyses are utilized to gather comprehensive insights. Data collection includes surveys and interviews with educators across various educational contexts.
Results. The findings reveal significant difficulties for educators in assigning partially undeserved grades and providing motivating grades. Despite these difficulties, educators express pride in their grading practices. The study highlights the emotional landscape of grading, particularly the heightened stress during the pandemic. It also assesses educators' perceptions of grade inflation and its impact on the assessment system.
Conclusions. Albanian educators face grading challenges, especially with undeserved grades and grade inflation, impacting their emotions. Support, localized strategies, and policy reforms are needed to enhance the educational experience and integrity.
Practical application. The insights gained from this study can inform educators, policymakers, and stakeholders, fostering a conducive environment for learning, growth, and equity. The research emphasizes the importance of localized strategies to enhance the grading experience within the Albanian educational system.
Cognitive value. This comprehensive approach contributes valuable knowledge to the discourse on educational grading practices in Albania. By exploring nuanced aspects of grading, the study sets the stage for meaningful discussions and interventions, addressing the unique challenges faced by Albanian educators.
Downloads
References
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Brackett, M. A., Reyes, M. R., Rivers, S. E., Elbertson, N. A., & Salovey, P. (2011). Classroom emotional climate, teacher affiliation, and student conduct. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 46(1), 27-36.
Butler, R., & Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(3), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.3.210
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
DeCino, D. A., Waalkes, P. L., & Chesnut, S. (2023). Students’ perceptions of grades and grade inflation in counselor training. Teaching and Supervision in Counseling, 5(2), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.7290/tsc05Ffyf
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In A. Lugmayr (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Duka, A., Leka, K., Vampa, M., Bursová, J., & Jenisová, Z. (2024). The impact of climate in inclusive classrooms - influencing the motivation of students with special needs. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(1), 303-314. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.303.314
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Jemini-Gashi, L., & Hoxha, N. (2024). Role of social support in the relationship between career self-efficacy and psychological distress among young people during the COVID-19 pandemic. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241243172
Leka, K., & Roseni, E. (2022). Students challenges in online learning engagement. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 12(6), 298-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0164
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., Hamilton, L. S., & Pane, J. D. (2017). Informing progress: Insights on personalized learning implementation and effects. RAND Corporation. http://dx.doi.org/10.7249/RR2042
Pulfrey, C., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2011). Why grades engender performance-avoidance goals: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 683–700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023911
Rojstaczer, S., & Healy, C. (2012). Where A is ordinary: The evolution of American college and university grading, 1940-2009. Teachers College Record, 114(7), 1-23. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/016146811211400707
Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anita Muho, Rregjina Gokaj, Helena Grillo Mukli, Lindita Lutaj
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.