Creative Teaching in the Context of Educational Reform: Insights from the Perspective of In-service Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.2.323.339Keywords:
creative teaching, teacher perspectives, teacher development, educational reform, TaiwanAbstract
Aim. This study aims to elucidate the multifaceted nature of creative teaching within the specific context of educational reform by exploring the nuanced perspectives of in-service teachers through their real-life teaching experiences.
Methods. A qualitative approach was adopted, with semi-structured, vignette-based interviews with 19 teachers from elementary, junior high, and senior high schools in Taiwan. Data analysis followed reflexive thematic analysis methods.
Results. The findings underscore that in-service teachers perceive creative teaching not as the creation of entirely new educational paradigms but rather as the adoption of unconventional methods. This entails the adaptive and strategic utilisation of diverse teaching methods, the integration of multidisciplinary content, and an enduring commitment to continuous improvement. It is an incremental process involving the continuous absorption of new concepts, the adaptation of new methods, and making progressive adjustments.
Conclusion. Enhancing teachers’ creative teaching requires a context-specific understanding of its essence, facilitating targeted promotion and teacher education. This study addresses the research gap by qualitatively investigating teachers’ perspectives on creative teaching and its implementation. The insights gained in this study are crucial in guiding the effective integration of creativity into pedagogical practice within teacher education and professional development endeavours.
Cognitive value. This study challenges the conventional notion that creative teaching involves the invention of entirely new methods, arguing instead that creative teaching is primarily concerned with the ways in which teachers implement unconventional approaches, rather than the novelty of those approaches. These findings offer a novel perspective on fostering creative teaching within teacher development endeavours.
Downloads
References
Akyıldız, S. T., & Çelik, V. (2020). Thinking outside the box: Turkish EFL teachers’ perceptions of creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, Article 100649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100649
Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: A systematic review of the recent research literature. Educational Research Review, 23, 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.003
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chen, F.-C. (2021). Pǔ tōng gāo zhōng rú hé zhuǎn yì 108 kè gang: Zhèng cè cù dòng guān diǎn [How senior high schools translate the 108 National Curriculum Guidelines: Perspectives on a policy enactment]. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 24(1), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202101_24(1).0006
Chin, E.-T., & Lin, F.-L. (2013). A survey of the practice of a large-scale implementation of inquiry-based mathematics teaching: From Taiwan’s perspective. ZDM, 45(6), 919–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0546-y
College Entrance Examination Center. (2021). The college admission process in Taiwan. https://www.ceec.edu.tw/en/xmdoc/cont?xsmsid=0J180519600611186512
Cortazzi, M., Pilcher, N., & Jin, L. (2011). Language choices and “blind shadows”: Investigating interviews with Chinese participants. Qualitative Research, 11(5), 505–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413225
Craft, A., Hall, E., & Costello, R. (2014). Passion: Engine of creative teaching in an English university? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.03.003
Cremin, T., & Chappell, K. (2021). Creative pedagogies: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 36(3), 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1677757
Fwu, B.-J. (2018). Sù yang dǎo xiàng guó jiào xīn kè gang de shī zī péi yù: Guó lì tái wān dà xué “tàn jiù shì - sù yang dǎo xiàng” de shī zī péi yù [Teacher preparation in response to competence-based curriculum reform for K-12 education: National Taiwan University’s proposal of inquiry-based and competence-based teacher education]. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 59–87. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003
Hsieh, P.-J. (2018). 108 kè gang dì sì xué xí jiē duàn guó yǔ wén yuè dú sù yang xiàn shàng píng liáng zhī jiàn gòu [Development and validation of an online assessment module for Mandarin reading literacy for middle school students of the 12-Year Basic Education Program]. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 193–228. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0007
Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationships. Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159750
Joy, E., Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Doing reflexive thematic analysis: A reflexive account. In F. Meyer & K. Meissel (Eds.), Research methods for education and the social disciplines in Aotearoa New Zealand. NZCER Press.
Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Lai, C.-C. (2020). Shēng huó kē jì kè chéng shí zuò jiào xué de lǐ lùn tàn jiù yǔ jiào shī fǎng tán [Theoretical review of practical-based instruction of living technology course and interviews about teachers’ experience]. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 23(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202010_23(4).0001
Lin, W.-W., & Liu, C.-Y. (2016). Péi yùkē xuéjiào xuéchuàng zào lìkē xuéjiào xuéchuàng xīnyào sùzhītàn [On exploring factors for creative science teaching]. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 48(1), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20150422
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Liu, H. Y., & Wang, I. T. (2019). Creative teaching behaviors of health care school teachers in Taiwan: Mediating and moderating effects. BMC Medical Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1641-8
Marques Nascimento Macêdo, N. M., & Bispo, M. de S. (2023). Qualitative vignettes drawing on real cases as method in organizational Research. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 40(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1692
Meintjes, H., & Grosser, M. (2010). Creative thinking in prospective teachers: The status quo and the impact of contextual factors. South African Journal of Education, 30, 361–386.
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Ministry of Education. (2022). Education in Taiwan (2022/2023). https://www.studyintaiwan.org/upload/file/Education_in_Taiwan_(2022-2023).pdf
Mullet, D. R., Willerson, A., N. Lamb, K., & Kettler, T. (2016). Examining teacher perceptions of creativity: A systematic review of the literature. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.001
Naz, F., & Murad, H. S. (2017). Innovative teaching has a positive impact on the performance of diverse students. SAGE Open, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017734022
Nkambule, N. S., & Tang, C.-W. (2023). Building a case for communities of practice as drivers of innovative teaching in English medium instruction context. Higher Education, 87, 721-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01032-w
Pan, H.-L. W., & Cheng, S.-H. (2021). Jiào shì wáng guó de jiě fēng: gōng kāi shòu kè jí qí xiāng guān yīn sù fēn xī. [To lift the lockdown of classroom kingdoms: Open classes and its influential factors]. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 24(3), 177–208. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202107_24(3).0007
Pan, H.-L. W., Huang, L.-L., Chen, W.-Y., & Cheng, S.-H. (2020). Xué xiào zhǔn bèi hǎo le ma? Guó gāo zhōng jiào yù rén yuan shí shī 108 kè gang de biàn gé [Are schools ready? School practitioners’ change readiness for the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 16(1), 65–100. https://doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.202003_16(1).0003
Puryear, J. S., & Lamb, K. N. (2020). Defining creativity: How far have we come since Plucker, Beghetto, and Dow? Creativity Research Journal, 32(3), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1821552
Rice, D. (2017). How governance conditions affect the individualization of active labour market services: An exploratory vignette study. Public Administration, 95(2), 468–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12307
Sampson, H., & Johannessen, I. A. (2020). Turning on the tap: the benefits of using ‘real-life’ vignettes in qualitative research interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118816618
Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033002012
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Sternberg, R. J., & Karami, S. (2022). An 8P theoretical framework for understanding creativity and theories of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.516
Tanggaard, L. (2011). Stories about creative teaching and productive learning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.558078
Wei, J.-H., Chuang, H.-H., & Smith, T. J. (2022). The relationship between a school culture’s openness to creative solutions and inquiry-based teaching practices. Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(3), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.535
Wei, J.-H., Lacaste, A. V., Rodliyah, I. N., Nguyen, H. T., & Chuang, H.-H. (2022). Teachers’ Multicultural Experience, Creative Teaching, and Cultural Intelligence: A Study of Four Asia–Pacific Countries. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, Article 101144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101144
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ju-Hui Wei, Hsueh-Hua Chuang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
