Post-Digital Art Practice in Educational Space

Authors

  • Ludmyla Kondratska Department of Musicology and Methodology of Musical Art, Faculty of Arts, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, ul. Maxym Kryvonos 2, 46024 Ternopil, Ukraine
  • Liudmila Romanovska Social Work and Pedagogics Department, Humanities Faculty, Khmelnytsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine
  • Tetiana Kravchyna Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of International Relations and Law, Khmelnytsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine
  • Yuliia Ovod Social Work and Pedagogics Department, Humanities Faculty, Khmelnitsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine
  • Valentyna Litynska Marketing Department, Faculty of Economics and Management, Khmelnitsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine
  • Mykola Novak Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, Faculty of Health, Psychology, Physical Culture and Sports, Khmelnytsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.2.633.649

Keywords:

post-digital art, anthropotemporal methodology, technological convergence, art class, competence in theoesthetic modeling of artistic dialogue, hybrid educational space, criteria, pedagogical conditions

Abstract

Aim. The aim of the article is to validate the pedagogical model for mastering post-digital art practice by future designers.

Methods. Its content is determined by the integral anthropotemporal methodology of the organisation of the hybrid educational space, which involves the harmonisation of the intellectual and emotional interaction of the subjects of post-digital art education to project a possible future – Salvation. The priority in this process is the open gestalt of artistic questioning and realisation of the network design of beauty as a spiritual-ontological factor, and the criteria are: the ability to recognise the artistic meaning of the happiness of existence in the polysemy of the text; the competence of theoesthetic modeling of artistic dialogue in the post-digital space and the experience of creating beauty as a good.

Results. The implementation of the technological convergence of participatory edutainment and spiritual self-coaching contributed to the mastery of the specified pedagogical model by future performers. The result of its implementation was the acquisition by future performers of post-digital competencies of entropy-informational and adaptive-selective development, performative improvisation, artistic education as an attraction (‘the contemplation’ of an individual in the self-sufficiency of aestheticized Lighting).

Conclusion. Thus, mastering the space of post-digital art practice by the future performer involves the activation of his vivid experiential feeling within the artistic sense of oecumenism. A new technonature of the world cannot be built without the human experience of arbitrary paseistic impulse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ludmyla Kondratska, Department of Musicology and Methodology of Musical Art, Faculty of Arts, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, ul. Maxym Kryvonos 2, 46024 Ternopil, Ukraine

    She holds a Doctorate in Pedagogical Sciences and serves as a Professor with 32 years of scientific experience. After completing her studies at Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University in 1990, she pursued postgraduate education at the Research Institute of Personality Development in Moscow and later completed her doctoral studies at Drahomanov National Pedagogical University. She currently leads the research laboratory focused on the spiritual development of creative personalities at Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University. Her research interests encompass epistemology, Ukrainian art, and music anthropology.

  • Liudmila Romanovska, Social Work and Pedagogics Department, Humanities Faculty, Khmelnytsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine

    She is a Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor. She is a founder of a scientific school “Theory and practice of socio-pedagogical activity and social-psychological assistance in Ukraine and abroad”, which conducts both fundamental and applied research fundamental and applied research in the field of social work, social pedagogy, psychology, and professional pedagogy. Since 2005 she has been a member of the Ukrainian Union of Psychologists and Psychotherapists. Luidmyla Romanovska is also a co-founder and member of the public organization “League of Social Workers of Khmelnytsky Region”.

  • Tetiana Kravchyna, Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of International Relations and Law, Khmelnytsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine

    She is Associate Professor, has PhD degree in Psychology. Since 2002 she has been teaching English and German at Khmelnytsky National University. She has authored over 80 scientific publications. Since 2024 she is a Doctoral student of the Department of Social Work and Management of Sociocultural Activities of Volodymyr Hnatyuk Ternopil National Pedagogical University. She is also a member of the editorial board of the scientific journal “Social Pedagogy: Theory and Practice”. Her research interests include psychology of education, psycholinguistics, methodology of teaching foreign languages, social work and pedagogics.

  • Yuliia Ovod, Social Work and Pedagogics Department, Humanities Faculty, Khmelnitsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine

    She is Associate Professor, has PhD degree in Pedagogy. She is a developer of the educational and methodological complex for the study of the courses “Social support of recipients of social services”, “Social protection and security”, “Social insurance and pension provision”, “The work of a social pedagogue in educational institutions”, “Psychological and pedagogical foundations of social work with the disabled”. Since 2019 she is also a member of “League of Social Workers of Ukraine”.

  • Valentyna Litynska, Marketing Department, Faculty of Economics and Management, Khmelnitsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine

    She is Associate Professor, has PhD degree in Economics. Her research interests encompass “Marketing Analytics”, “Consumer Behavior”, “Marketing Audit”, “Career Marketing”. She is an author and co-author of more than 100 scientific and about 30 educational and methodological publications. She is a member of the editorial board of the scientific International Journal of Business and Economics Research.

  • Mykola Novak, Department of Psychology and Pedagogy, Faculty of Health, Psychology, Physical Culture and Sports, Khmelnytsky National University, ul. Institutska 11, 29006 Khmelnytsky, Ukraine

    He is a post graduate student who graduated from Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture in 2020. In 2022, he began his postgraduate studies at Khmelnytsky National University (specialty: Psychology). His research interests include the psychology of overcoming stress and crisis situations, philosophy of education, social work. The title of the dissertation: Social and psychological conditions for the development of specialists’ stress resistance in the social sphere in the conditions of war.

References

Ahern, K. (2022). Sound scaping learning spaces: Online synchronicity and composing multiple sonic worlds. Post-Digital Science and Education, 4(1), 160-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00261-5

Alexenberg, M. (2011). The Future of Art in a Postdigital Age: From Hellenistic to Hebraic Consciousness (2nd ed.). Intellect Books/University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvpkc

Andrews, I. (2013). Post-Digital Aesthetics and the Function of Process. In K. Cleland, L. Fisher & R. Harley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium of Electronic Art, ISEA2013 (pp. 256-258). Sydney, Australia.

Barad, K. (2012). Nature’s Queer Performativity. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, 1-2, 25-53. https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v0i1-2.28067

Bartholl, A. (2014). What are you waiting for? [Clip art]. Tique (publication on contemporary art). Antwerp, Belgium. https://tique.art/features/aram-bartholl/

Bayne, S. (2015). What's the matter with ‘technology-enhanced learning’? Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.915851

Bissoli, G., Bottes, O., Perri, F., Regolini, A., & Scapin, G. (2017). TEDD experience: An innovative educational methodology explained by students. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), ICERI2017 Proceedings (pp. 6389-6397). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2017.1650

Boys, J. (2022). Exploring inequalities in social, spatial and material practices of teaching and learning in times of pandemic. Post-Digital Science and Education, 4, 13-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00267-z

Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman Humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1

Bridle, J. (2011). The New Aesthetic. James Bridle. https://jamesbridle.com/works/the-new-aesthetic

Bryant, R., & Knight D. (2019). The anthropology of the future. New departures in anthropology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108378277

Carvalho, L., Goodyear P., & Laat M. (Eds.). (2022). Place-based spaces for networked learning. Routledge.

Cascone, K. (2017). The aesthetics of failure: Post-digital tendencies. Contemporary Computer Music Journal, 24(4), 12-18.

Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford University Press.

Cramer, F. (2013). Google.nl image search result for “digital”, 10/2013 [Clip art]. In F. Cramer, What is ‘post-digital’?. A Peer-Reviewed Journal About Post-digital Research, 3(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.7146/aprja.v3i1.116068

Cramer, F. (2015). What Is ‘Post-digital’?. In D. M. Berry & M. Dieter (Eds.), Postdigital Aesthetics: art, computation and design (pp. 12-26). (1st ed.), Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437204_2

Dede, Ch., Richards J., & Saxberg B. (Eds.). (2018). Learning Engineering for Online Education: Theoretical Contexts and Design-Based Examples. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351186193

Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Hodgson, V., & Mcconnell, D. (Eds.). (2012). Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning. Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0496-5

Duran, Zh. (1999). Antropological structures of the imaginary. Bombana Publications.

Fawns, T. (2019). Postdigital Education in Design and Practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1, 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0021-8

Ford, D. R. (2023). Teaching the Actuality of Revolution. Aesthetics, Unlearning, and the Sensations of Struggle. Iskra Books.

Fuchs, Ch. (2023) Digital Democracy and the Digital Public Sphere. Media, Communication and Society Volume Six. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003331087

Goodyear, P. (2022). Realising the good university: Social innovation, care, design justice and educational infrastructure. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00253-5

Gourlay, L. & Oliver, M. (2018). Engaging students in the digital university: Sociomaterial assemblages. Routledge.

Green, J. (2022). Designing Hybrid Spaces for Learning in Higher Education Health Contexts. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00268-y

Harris, H. (2019). А dreamy portrait [Painting]. In E. L. Sarah (Ed.), Henrietta Harris and Photoshop Response. https://emmaleighsarah.wordpress.com/2016/03/20/henrietta-harris-and-photoshop-response/

Herlitz, L., & Zahn, M. (2019). Bildungstheoretische Potentiale postdigitaler Ästhetiken – Eine methodologische Annäherung [Educational theoretical potentials of postdigital aesthetics – methodological approach]. Kulturelle Bildung Online. https://www.kubi- online.de /artikel/bildungstheoretische-potentiale-postdigitaler-aesthetiken-methodologische-annaeherung).

Hickey-Moody, A. C. (2020). New materialism, ethnography, and socially engaged practice: Space-time folds and the agency of matter. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 724–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418810728

Jandric, P., & Hayes, S. (2020). Postdigital we-learn. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(3), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09711-2

Jones, C., Ryberg, T., de Laat, M. (2015). Networked Learning. In M. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory (pp. 1-6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_129-1

King James Bible. (2017). King James Bible Online. https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/ (Original work published 1769)

Knox, J. (2019). What Does the ‘Postdigital’ Mean for education? Three critical perspectives on the digital, with implications for educational research and practice. Post-Digital Science and Education, 1, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00045-y

Kolb, D. (2015). Experiential Learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Pentice Hall.

Kondratska, L., Romanovska, L., Kravchyna, T., Kozachenko, S., & Novak, M. (2023). Nomadic models of postmodern aesthetics: Soteriological choice of the teacher. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 14(1), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2023.1.435.450

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.

Lefebvre, H. (2006). Writings on cities (E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Trans). Blackwell Publishing. (Original work published 1996)

Müllensiefen, D., Gingras, B., Musil, J., Stewart, L. (2014). The Musicality of Non-Musicians: An Index for Assessing Musical Sophistication in the General Population. PLoS ONE 9(2), Article e89642. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089642

Nordquist, J., & Laing, A. (2015). Designing spaces for a networked learning landscape. Medical Teacher, 37(4), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.1001349

Oliver, M. (2016). What is technology? In N. Rushby, & D.W. Surry (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of learning technology (pp. 35–57). Wiley-Blackwell.

Pischetola, M. (2022). Teaching novice teachers to enhance learning in the hybrid university. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 70–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00257-1

Raes, A. (2022). Exploring student and teacher experiences in hybrid learning environments: Does presence matter? Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00274-0

Reddington, S. (2022). Authenticating disability perspectives and advancing inclusive agendas that value disability identity in schools. International Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.52291/ijse.2022.37.23

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Scannell, E.D., Allen, F.C.L. (2012). The Mehrabian Achieving Tendency Scale (MATS): Reliability, validity and relationship to demographic characteristics. Current Psychology, 19(4), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-000-1022-8

Schmidt-Crawford, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, Article 106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586

Stucin, S. (2013, June 5). Maiko Takeda [Photograph]. Flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/sasastucin/8900714214

Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., & Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction et validation de l'Échelle de Motivation en Éducation (EME) [Construction and validation of the Educational Motivation Scale (EME)]. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 21, 323-349.

van der Tuin, I. & Nocek, A. J. (2019). New concepts for materialism. Philosophy Today, 63(4), 815-822. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2019634294

Wardak, D., Vallis, C., & Bryant, P. (2022). #OurPlace2020: Blurring Boundaries of Learning Spaces. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00264-2

Wilson, S. A. (2022). Musical Lens on Spatial Representations of Form to Support Designers and Teachers Using Hybrid Learning Spaces. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00262-4

Downloads

Published

2024-09-25

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Education Culture and Society

Section

EXPRESSION

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Ludmyla Kondratska, Liudmila Romanovska, Tetiana Kravchyna, Yuliia Ovod, Valentyna Litynska, Mykola Novak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

CC-BY

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.

How to Cite

Kondratska, L. ., Romanovska, L. ., Kravchyna, T. ., Ovod, Y. ., Litynska, V. ., & Novak, M. . (2024). Post-Digital Art Practice in Educational Space. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(2), 633-649. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.2.633.649

Most read articles by the same author(s)