The Importance of the Novelty Factor in Teaching Listening Comprehension

Authors

  • Anikó Ficzere Department of Romance and German Studies, Faculty of Arts, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Štefánikova 67, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia
  • Ivan Haringa Department of Romance and German Studies, Faculty of Arts, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Štefánikova 67, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia
  • Ervín Weiss Department of Romance and German Studies, Faculty of Arts, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Štefánikova 67, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.315.330

Keywords:

teaching, listening comprehension didactics, novelty, thought flexibility, student

Abstract

Aim. Acquiring the skill of listening comprehension can be considered as a difficult process, which is influenced by the personality traits of the student. Tolerance of novelty is an inherent and innovative factor in teaching a foreign language, which plays an important role in the effective processing of new information. The aim of the research is to determine the difference in listening comprehension performance between groups with different levels of tolerance of novelty.

Methods. We used standardised test to determine listening comprehension efficiency and the subscale of the Tolerance of Ambiguity Scale instrument to determine the degree of tolerance of novelty. The research was implemented with 154 university students who studied professional English at language level B2.

Results. A statistically significant difference in listening comprehension between respondents with high and average levels of tolerance of novelty was confirmed. Furthermore, we found significantly different listening performance between respondents with high and low tolerance of novelty. Respondents with a high tolerance of novelty deliver greater results in listening in a foreign language than people with an average and low level of tolerance of novelty.

Conclusion. Research shows that students with a higher tolerance of novelty are more willing to experiment with new, alternative forms and language structures in a foreign language. The personality factor of tolerance of novelty belongs to relatively dynamic personality characteristics that can be optimised with the help of the teacher's deliberate action and in this way simultaneously stimulate the cognitive processes of listening and understanding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Anikó Ficzere, Department of Romance and German Studies, Faculty of Arts, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Štefánikova 67, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia

    A young researcher and lecturer in the Department of Romance and German Studies at the Faculty of Arts, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra. Her research focuses on the field of cognitive linguistics, specifically, psycholinguistics (the field of cognitive processes in learning foreign languages and the development of language skills of learners), applied psychology (the field of internet addiction a.o.). 

  • Ivan Haringa, Department of Romance and German Studies, Faculty of Arts, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Štefánikova 67, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia

    PhD. student and a young researcher at the Department of Romance and German Studies at the Faculty of Arts, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra. His research focuses on the field of linguistics, psycholinguistics, and foreign language didactics (English and German). Currently, he is occupied with research about influence of tolerance of ambiguity and students' podcasts on developing listening comprehension and speaking skills.

  • Ervín Weiss, Department of Romance and German Studies, Faculty of Arts, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Štefánikova 67, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia

    An assistant professor in the Department of Romance and German Studies at the Faculty of Arts, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra. His research focuses on the field of linguistics and applied linguistics. 

References

Bajan, D., Pavera, L., Judak, V., Lojan, R., & Mroskova, L. (2023). Developing moral competencies in the training of social workers. Acta Missiologica, 17(1), 144-150.

Başöz, T. (2015). Exploring the relationship between tolerance of ambiguity of EFL learners and their vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 11(2), 53-66.

Budner, N. Y. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x

Cambridge English. (2023). B2 first. Handbook for teachers for exams. Cambridge University Press & Assessment. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/167791-b2-first-handbook.pdf

Civegna, K. (2005). Authentische Texte [Authentic texts]. In H. L. Krechel (Ed.), Mehrsprachiger Fachunterricht in Ländern Europa [Multilingual subject teaching in European countries] (pp. 168-172). Gunter Narr Verlag.

Dehbozorgi, E. (2012). Effects of attitude towards language learning and risk-taking on EFL student's proficiency. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(2), 41.

Dewaele, J. & Ip, T. S. (2013). The link between Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety, Second Language Tolerance of Ambiguity and Self-rated English proficiency among Chinese learners. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.1.3

Dewaele, J. & Wei, L. (2013). Is multilingualism linked to a higher tolerance of ambiguity? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000570

Djabborova, F. O. (2020). Ways of developing listening skills of English learners in ESL and EFL classroom. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 8(10), 212-216.

El-Koumy, A. S. (2009). Differences in FL reading comprehension among high-, middle-, and low-ambiguity tolerance. Students Education Resources Information Center (ERIC). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2365143

Estes, W. K. (2022). Handbook of learning and cognitive processes. Psychology Press.

Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667244

Gadušová, Z. & Hašková, A. (2020). Teachers` competences evaluation: Case study. Science for Education Today,10(3), 164-177.

Gadušová, Z., Pavlíková, M., & Havettová, R. (2021). Intervention in teaching reading in a foreign language: Development of divergent thinking and ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(1), 297–313.

Gadušová, Z., Predanocyová, Ľ, & Malá, E. (2020). Planning education - Assessment of the competence: (Case study). Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 10(1), 82-86.

Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). An Anxiety / Uncertainty Management (AUM) theory of strangers’ intercultural adjustment. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 419-457). Sage.

Halone, K. K., Cunconan, T. M., Coakley, C. G., & Wolvin, A. D. (1998). Toward the establishment of general dimensions underlying the listening process. International Journal of Listening, 12, 12–28.

Hantschel, H. J., Brinitzer, M., Kroemer, S., Möller-Frorath, M., & Ros, L. (2013). DaF unterrichten. Basiswissen Didaktik Deutsch als Fremd- und Zweitsprache. [Teaching German as a foreign language. Basic knowledge in didactics of German as a foreign and second language]. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.

Hirsh, J. B., Mar, R. A., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). Psychological entropy: a framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychological Review, 119(2), 304-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026767

Hřebíčková, M. (2004). NEO osobnostní inventář (podle NEO-PI-R P.T. Costy a R.R. McCraee) [NEO personality inventory (based on NEO-PI-R of P.T. Costa and R.R. McCrae)]. Testcentrum.

Judák, V., Hlad, Ľ., Ďatelinka, A., & Zemančík, V. (2023). Symboly jubilejního roka ako pozývajúce znamenia ku komplexnému rozvoju človeka postmodernej doby. Historicko-teologická kerygmatická štúdia. [Symbols of the jubilee year as inviting signs to the complex development of man in the postmodern age. A historical-theological kerygmatic study]. Historia Ecclesiastica, 14(1), 218-234. https://www.unipo.sk/public/media/46853/historia_ecclesiastica_01_2023.pdf

Khonamri, F., Azizi, M., & Králik, R. (2020). Using interactive e-based flipped learning to enhance EFL literature students‘ critical reading. Science for Education Today, 10(1), 25–42.

Kobylarek, A., Madej, M., Roubalová, M., & Maturkanič, P. (2022). Holistic education of seniors in the Eastern European model of the U3A. Acta Missiologica, 16(1), 87-98.

Langley, P. & Simon, H. A. (2013). The central role of learning in cognition. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 361-380). Psychology Press.

Levi, L. (1965). The urinary output of adrenalin and noradrenalin during pleasant and unpleasant emotional states: A preliminary report. Psychosomatic Medicine, 27(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-196501000-00009

Liu, C. (2015). Relevant researches on tolerance of ambiguity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(9), 1874–1882. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0509.15

Liu, M. (2012). Predicting effects of personality traits, self-esteem, language class risk-taking and sociability on Chinese university EFL learners’ performance in English. Journal of Second Language Teaching and Research, 1(1), 30-57. https://doi.org/10.5420/jsltr.01.01.3318

McCrae, R. R. (2004). Openness to experience. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology (pp. 707–709). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-657410-3/00068-4

McCrae, R. R. & Costa, J. P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81

McLain, D.L., Kefallonitis, E., & Armani, K. (2015). Ambiguity tolerance in organizations: Definitional clarification and perspectives on future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00344

Mercer, S. Ryan, S., & Williams, M. (2012). Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillian.

Orzeck, T. & Lung, E. (2005). Big-five personality differences of cheaters and non-cheaters. Current Psychology, 24(4), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-005-1028-3

Peabody, D. & Goldberg, L. R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 57(3), 552–567. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.552

Purba, D. (2022). Analysis of modern methods to teach listening skills. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362202302_ANALYSIS_OF_MODERN_METHODS_TO_TEACH_LISTENING_SKILLS

Richards, J. C. & Burns, A. (2012). Tips for teaching listening: A practical approach. Pearson Education.

Rost, M. (2016). Teaching and researching: Listening (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Roubalová, M., Hlad, Ľ., Šuráb, M., Maturkanič, P., & Králik, R. (2023). Teologické důrazy zákazu přijímat úplatek v kontextu Tanachu a Rabínské tradice [Theological implications of the prohibition of accepting bribes in the context of Tanakh and Rabbinic tradition]. Historia Ecclesiastica, 14(1), 179-200. https://www.unipo.sk/public/media/46853/historia_ecclesiastica_01_2023.pdf

Scrivener, J. (2011). Learning teaching. MacMillan.

Simha, A. & Parboteeah, K. P. (2020). Correction to: The big 5 personality traits and willingness to justify unethical behavior—a cross-national examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(3), 451-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04142-7

Stradiotová, E., Zsapková, E., & Pašková, H. (2018). Počúvanie s porozumenı́m s podporou technológiı́ [Listening comprehension with the support of technology]. In I. Kunovská (Ed.). Moderné trendy vo výučbe cudzích jazykov (pp. 141-156). Tribun EU.

Stranovská, E. (2011). Psycholingvistika: Determinanty osvojovania si a učenia sa cudzieho jazyka a kultúry [Psycholinguistics: Determinants of acquisition and learning of a foreign language and culture]. MSD.

Stranovská, E. & Ficzere, A. (2022). The application of intervention programmes and the development of reading comprehension predictors. Verlag Dr. Kovač.

Stranovská, E., Hvozdíková, S., & Munková, D. (2019). Selected factors and successfulness in the process of foreign language learning. Verlag Dr. Kovač.

Tokárová, B., Simon, L., Páleniková. K., Maryanovich, D., & Jenisová, Z. (2023). Education of foreign languages examined using the semantic differential. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 14(2), 227-241. https://www.jecs.pl/index.php/jecs/article/view/1592

Umpa, J. (2023). IELTS Listening Test: Listening comprehension difficulties of grade 11 students. Global Scientific Journal, 11(8), 515-523.

Yaseen, A. & Alahmed, K. (2023). Developing EFL learners' listening comprehension through listening strategy instruction. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics, 2(11), 74-86.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-13

How to Cite

Ficzere, A., Haringa, I., & Weiss, E. (2024). The Importance of the Novelty Factor in Teaching Listening Comprehension. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 15(1), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.315.330