Students’ Alienation from Learning Activity: Some Insights from High-School Seniors’ Study in Lithuania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.549.555Keywords:
student alienation, school alienation, alienation from learning, mixed-method approachAbstract
Aim. The aim of this research is to define the causes of student alienation from learning in the high-school seniors (aged 18-19) population (n=227) of three randomly chosen Lithuanian high schools.
Methods. In this analysis, we use a mixed-method approach. In the first research phase, we used the quantitative school alienation measurement instrument proposed by Julia Morinaj et al. (2019), which helped to locate the extreme cases of alienation and non-alienation in research schools. In the second phase, both research groups (7 alienated and 7 non-alienated) were interviewed individually using qualitative semi-structured interviews. Data gathered from interviews was processed using the thematic analysis method, proposed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2012).
Results. The results confirmed earlier theoretical presumptions that defined school alienation as a multifaceted and case-sensitive phenomenon. The qualitative approach has revealed its’ multi-dimensional nature illustrated by students’ experiences.
Conclusion. Alienation from learning could be interpreted as a level of learning actualisation that is perceived by the student, which could be influenced by individual and/or structural factors, such as individual attitude towards learning, learning styles, parental influence, teacher and classmates support, future career/academic plans and expectations.
Cognitive value. According to our literature analysis made prior to the research, it is the first attempt to analyse school alienation using a mixed-method approach, which combines verified quantitative and qualitative instruments. It is hoped that this research will be of benefit for the further conceptualisation of the school alienation phenomenon and could be a practical guide in everyday pedagogical practice.
Downloads
References
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed-Method Research: Introduction and Application. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Handbook of Educational Policy (pp. 455-472). Academic Press.
Hascher, T. & Hadjar, A. (2018). School alienation – Theoretical approaches and educational research. Educational Research, 60(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1443021
Jaeggi, R. (2014). Alienation. Columbia University Press.
Morinaj, J., Hadjar, A., & Hascher, T. (2019). School alienation and academic achievement in Switzerland and Luxembourg: a longitudinal perspective. Social Psychology of Education, 23(2), 279–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09540-3
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
Schacht, R. (1994). The future of alienation. University of Illinois Press.
Seeman, M. (1959). On The Meaning of Alienation. American Sociological Review, 24(6), 783–791.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Juozapas Labokas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
