Remote qualitative interviews

A contribution towards the analysis of remediation


  • Mikołaj Łątkowski University of Warsaw, Institute of Polish Culture Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland



qualitative interviews, remediation, qualitative researchers, interviews


Aim. The aim of this article is to contribute towards a wider analysis of remote qualitative interviews taking into consideration the context of qualitative research as a social practice, which is often overlooked in the body of literature.

Methods. The study is based on twelve in-depth interviews with qualitative researchers conducted by the author. The data is analysed with the focus on social aspects of qualitative interviews which engage the interviewee and the interviewer alike.

Results and conclusion. The analysis shows that, from the perspective of the researcher, the social aspects of qualitative interviews constitute an important part of the research method. The interview is a meeting that combines methodological features with the attitude of involved people. Researchers are accustomed to in-person interviews and from that perspective, they evaluate possible losses caused by remote research. However, as they self-reflect, this is not always an inherent feature of the new media but rather a question of how they are used and by whom. The interview is a meeting that utilises communication habits and experiences from both sides of the conversation – the interviewer and the interviewee. It is important to take this fact into consideration while analysing the potential of remote interviews, especially when social isolation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic is changing our communication habits.

Cognitive value. The remote qualitative interviews are often described from the perspective of usability and effectiveness. This article describes researchers as a part of the research process who have their own attitudes and experiences in conducting research. From the perspective of social practices, these are almost as important as the knowledge and attitude of interviewees and they also affect the results of the research process.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Mikołaj Łątkowski, University of Warsaw, Institute of Polish Culture Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00-927 Warszawa, Poland

    PhD student at the Institute of Polish Culture, University of Warsaw, Master in cultural studies and in bioethics. Main areas of his research are anthropology of literature and reading, anthropology of space, architecture and city. Prepares PhD thesis on the topic of reading practices in Warsaw reading groups.


Abrams, K. M., Wang, Z., Song, Y. J., & Galindo-Gonzalez, S. (2015). Data richness trade-offs between face-to-face, online audiovisual, and online text-only focus groups. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 80–96.

Bampton, R., Cowton, C., & Downs, Y. (2013). The e-interview in qualitative research. In: N. Sappleton (Ed.), Advancing Social and Business Research Methods with New Media Technology (pp. 329-343). IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA.

Bolter, J., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation. Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Burns, E. (2010). Developing email interview practices in qualitative research. Sociological Research Online, 15(4), 1–12.

Chartier, R., & Bourdieu, P. (2019). Lektura: praktyka kulturowa. Debata między Pierre’em Bourdieu i Rogerem Chartierem. In: Chartier, R. Czy książki wywołują rewolucje? Szkice z historii książki, lektury i kultury piśmiennej [Do books make revolutions? Sketches from the history of book, lecture and literate culture] (pp. 283-302). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research, 5, 603-616.

Glassmeyer, D. M., & Dibbs, R.-A. (2012). Researching from a distance: Using live web conferencing to mediate data collection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(3), 292–302.

Godlewski, G. (2008). Słowo – pismo – sztuka słowa. Perspektywy antropologiczne [Word – writing – art of word. Anthropological perspectives]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

Grębecka, Z. (2016). Legnickie opowieści o PRL-u. Prowadzenie wywiadu etnograficznego jako praktyka profesjonalna i międzyludzka. In: G. Godlewski, A. Karpowicz, M. Rakoczy (Eds.), Antropologia praktyk językowych [Anthropology of language practices] (pp. 298-324). Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

Hanna, P. (2012). Using Internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: a research note. Qualitative Research, 12(2), 239–242.

Havelock, E. (2007). Przedmowa do Platona [Preface to Plato]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

Hinchcliffe V., & Gavin, H. (2009). Social and virtual networks: Evaluating synchronous online interviewing using instant messenger. The Qualitative Report, 2, 318-340.

Holt, A. (2010). Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 113–121.

Iacono, V., Symonds, P., & Brown, D. (2016). Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociological Research Online, 2. Retrieved May 25, 2020, from

Irving, A. (2011). Duration, dominance and depth in telephone and face-to-face interviews: A comparative exploration. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(3), 202-220.

Johnson, D. R., Scheitle, C. P., & Ecklund, E. H. (2019). Beyond the in-person interview? How interview quality varies across in-person, telephone, and Skype interviews. Social Science Computer Review, 1, 1-17.

Kvale, S. (2010). Prowadzenie wywiadów [Conducting interviews]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Lupton, D. (Ed.) (2020). Doing fieldwork in a pandemic (crowd-sourced document), pp. 1-39. Retrieved May 25, 2020, from

Murray, J. (2011). Inventing Medium: Principles of Interaction Design as Cultural Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sade-Beck, L. (2004). Internet ethnography: Online and offline. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(2), 45-51.

Seitz, S. (2016). Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: a research note. Qualitative Research, 16(2), 229–235.




How to Cite

Łątkowski, M. . (2021). Remote qualitative interviews: A contribution towards the analysis of remediation. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(1), 202-211.