Double Portraiture in Art: The Couple Connection


  • Ruth Dorot School of Architecture Ariel University, Ramat Hagolan Str., Ariel, Israel



double portraits; frontal position; profile; domestic; communication; formal; Renaissance; surrealism; intimacy; alienation


Aim. The aim of this article is to examine and trace a selection of double portraits all adhering to social codes and norms, from the Renaissance to the present day depicting married couples who were well known in their day and highlighting that artistic fashion especially in northern Europe. Double portraits of a man and a woman are psychologically complex, since they usually provide a visual document of an emotional relationship. The artists’ styles of presentation analyse the characters and relationships of the couples as well as their social status.

Methods. The method applied in this paper was that of a qualitative collective case-study based on specific paintings, the comparing and contrasting of which leads to general conclusions. Ten double portraits were selected. They portray well known figures and were painted by a variety of artists. In the second stage, the chosen works were sorted and catalogued chronologically to reflect diversity in terms of people, professions or status. Next, they were analysed on the basis of the language of plastic art: line, colour, light and shadow, composition and overall unifying organization.

Results and Conclusions. Since art reflects reality, I demonstrated the development of the field of double portraits across time and how it clearly reflects social change in the role and perception of the wife.

Parallel to the development and change in art from the 15th century to the present day, the topic of the double portrait has also changed; each era had its prevailing conventions in terms of fashion, customs, a woman’s status, the development of technology and industry, freedom, liberation, and ‘artistic license’ that surprised, shocked and changed world orders. All these left their mark on the double portrait, which has come a long way from the height of formality to the hovering Chagall and Bella, or the self-annihilation of Picasso.



Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ruth Dorot, School of Architecture Ariel University, Ramat Hagolan Str., Ariel, Israel

A lecturer in art history at Ariel University – Israel, and is involved in various enrichment programs for the general public. She has served as curator of exhibitions, is a member of the Ministry of Culture's National Committee for the Evaluation of Museums and sits on the editorial board of several professional journals. She is the author of books: The Art of Time, The Art of Place as well as Symbolic Allusion, Temporal Illusion. Ruth is the recipient of the Israel Efrat Award from Bar Ilan University.


Alexander, S. (1990). Chagall. Tel Aviv: Ladori Press (in Hebrew).

Bedaux, J. B. (1986). The Reality of symbols: The Question of Disguised Symbolism in Jan van Eyck's ‘Arnolfini Portrait’. Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art, 16(1), 8.

Belkin, K. L. (1998). Rubens. London: Phaidon Press.

Binstock, B. (2009). Vermeer's Family Secrets: Genius, Discovery and the Unknown Apprentice. New York: Routledge.

Bulwer, J. (2003). Chirologia or The Natural Language of the Hand .Whitefish, MT: Kessinger Publishers.

Campbell, L. (1990). Renaissance Portraits: European Portrait Painting in the 14th, 15th, and 16th Centuries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Campbell, L. (1998). The Fifteenth Century Netherlandish Paintings. London: National Gallery.

Carr, M. (2015). How to Dream Like Salvador Dali. Psychology Today, Feb. 20. Retrieved from

Carroll, M. D. (1993). In the Name of God and Profit: Jan van Eyck’s “Arnolfini Portrait”. Representations, 44, 100-101.

Carroll, M. D. (2008). Painting and Politics in Northern Europe: Van Eyck, Bruegel, Rubens and their Contemporaries. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Chagall, B. (1987). First Encounter. New York: Schoken.

Chagall, M. (1965). My Life. London: Peter Owen.

Charles, C., Guerman, M., & Forestier, S. (1996). Marc Chagall. New York: Parkstone Press.

Chevalier, J., & Gheerbrant, A. (1996). J. Buchanan-Brown (trans.), The Penguin Dictionary of Symbols. London: Penguin Books.

Daix, P. (1994). Picasso Life and Art. London: Thames and Hudson.

Dali, S. (1948). 50 Secrets of Magic Craftsmanship. Dover: Dover Publications.

Digby, H. (1995). Rembrandt. London: Brompton Books.

Dorfman, J., Shames V.A., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1966). Intuition, Incubation and Insight in G. Underwood, (Ed.). Cognition in Problem Solving, (pp.257-296). New York: Oxford University Press.

Freud, S. (1953). The Theory of Instincts, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, XXIII. London: Hogarth Press.

Haines, C. (2002). International Women in Science a Biographical Dictionary to 1950. California: Santa Barbara Press.

Hall, E. (1994). The Arnolfini Betrothal, Medieval Marriage and the Enigma of Van Eyck's Double Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Harbison, C. (1990). Sexuality and Social Standing in Arnolfini's Double Portrait, Renaissance Quarterly, 43(2), 249-291

Hicks, C. (2012). Girl in a Green Gown. London: Vintage Books.

Jung, C. G. (2014). Two Essays on Analytical Psychology. London: Routledge

Kleiner, F. S. (2005). Gardner's Art through the Ages. Boston: Wadsworth Publishing.

Koster, M. L. (2003) The Arnolfini Double Portrait: A simple solution. Apollo 158 (499), 3-14

Landsberger, F. (1946). Rembrandt, the Jews and the Bible. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America.

Lehrer, J. (2009). Unlocking the Mysteries of the Artistic Mind. Psychology Today, July 1. Retrieved from:

Lorand, R., (1991). On the Nature of Art. Tel-Aviv: Dvir Publishing House.

Markus, R. (2000). Surrealism's Praying Mantis and Castrating Women. Woman's Art Journal, 21 (1), 33-39.

Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.

Panofsky, E. (1934). Jan Van Eyck's “Arnolfini Portrait”. Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs 64(372), 117-127.

Panofsky, E. (1953). Early Netherlandish Painting: Its Origin and Character. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2004). L'oeil et L' espirit. In H. Kenaan (Ed.). Maurice Merleau-Ponty: L'oeil et L' spirit Trans: Eran Dorfman. Tel–Aviv: Resling Publishing House.

Rosenberg, J. (1968). Rembrandt: Life and work. London: Phaidon Press.

Schneider, N. (1994). The Art of the Portrait. Cologne: Benedikt Taschen Verlag.

Seidel, L. (1989). Jan van Eyck's Arnolfini Portrait: Business as Usual? Critical Inquiry 16(1), 54-86.

Seidel, L. (1991). The Value of Verisimilitude in the Art of Jan van Eyck. Yale French Studies, Special Issue, 25-43.

Smith, D. (1982). Rembrandt's Early Double Portraits and the Dutch Conversation Piece. The Art Bulletin, 64(2), 259-288.

Smith, D. (1986). “Courtesy and its Discontents: Frans Hals” ‘Portrait of Isaac Massa and Beatrix van der Laen’. Oud Holland, 100(1), 2-34.

Vlieghe, H. (1998). Flemish Art and Architecture 1585-1700. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

West, S. (2004). Portraiture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Winnicott, D. (2005). Playing and Reality. New York: Routledge.

Woodall, D. M. (2008). Sharing Space: Double Portraiture in Renaissance Italy. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University.

Wullschlager, J. (2008). Chagall. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.




How to Cite

Dorot, R. . (2021). Double Portraiture in Art: The Couple Connection. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(1), 357–374.