THE LENS, FRAMES AND PATTERNS OF UKRAINIANS: HOW PERCEPTION OF THREAT AND RISK DETERMINES BEHAVIOUR IN THE COVID-19 SITUATION

  • Maryna Klimanska Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv Universytetska 1, Lviv, Ukraine
  • Larysa Klymanska Department of Sociology and Social Work, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine Konovaltsia 4, Lviv, Ukraine
  • Inna Haletska Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv Universytetska 1, Lviv, Ukraine
Keywords: pandemic, Covid-19, ideas of risk, virtual risk, risk as a potential threat, uncertain risk, uncertain danger, risk as a real threat, qualitative research, preventive health behaviour.

Abstract

Aim/Thesis. Identification and construction of the typology of individual ideas about the perception of the risk posed by COVID-19 and potential impact of individual ideas on behavioural human intentions. Risk perception is viewed as a social construct.

Concept/Methods. The subject matter of analysis consists of 91 transcripts of semi-structured interviews subjected to thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). On the basis of categories identified through thematic analysis a frame was created, through which an individual perceives the threat posed by COVID-19, while configuration of different subcategories shaped up four types of perception, used for data categorization.

Results and conclusion. Analysis of the results enabled to outline the very structure of frame for the assessment of the risk posed by COVID-19, it including seven categories, as well as to outline several typical frames in risk perception, which are traced in the informants’ conscience and are manifested in the intentions of behavioural responses to threat, viz.: potential danger (virtual risk); risk as a potential threat; uncertain risk; risk as a real threat.

Research restrictions. The restrictions in the research done include impossibility of regulating the selection of informants, since interviews were conducted in the quarantine conditions, therefore the choice of informants was made within the reach.

Practical application. Clarification of risk perception in the conditions of pandemic may enable health care representatives to more efficiently communicate with the public.

Originality/Cognitive value. The research was done in the quarantine period, thus it reflects real worries and opinions of informants under the threat of COVID-19. Implementation of the research using qualitative methods ensured focusing on subjective peculiarities of risk perception.

Conclusions: Typology of ideas, frames about risk in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic requires further clarifications and validation within a qualitative research.

Author Biographies

Maryna Klimanska, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv Universytetska 1, Lviv, Ukraine

Maryna Klimanska, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Universytetska 1, Lviv, Ukraine

Ph.D. (psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv (Ukraine). Scientific interests are focused on social psychology, environmental psychology, psychodiagnostics

 

Larysa Klymanska, Department of Sociology and Social Work, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, Ukraine Konovaltsia 4, Lviv, Ukraine

Larysa Klymanska, Department of Sociology and Social Work, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Konovaltsia 4, Lviv, Ukraine

Doctor of Political Science (D.Sc), Professor of Department of Sociology and Social Work, author of more than 150 scientific publications. Research interests: political communication, social problems, qualitative research in the social sciences.

Inna Haletska, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv Universytetska 1, Lviv, Ukraine

Inna Haletska, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Universytetska 1, Lviv, Ukraine

Ph.D. (psychology), Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv (Ukraine). Scientific interests are focused on health psychology, social psychology, psychodiagnostics

References

Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2010). Risk management and governance: concepts, guidelines and applications. Heidelberg , New York : Springer Science & Business Media

Bavel, J.J.V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P.S. et al. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z

Behaviour fuels, and fights, pandemics. (2020). Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 435 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0892-z

Betsch, C. (2020). How behavioural science data helps mitigate the COVID-19 crisis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0866-1

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Douglas, M. (1985). Risk acceptability according to the social sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Douglas M., & Wildavsky A. (1983). Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press

Erikson, S. (2020). Pandemics show us what government is for. Nature Human Behaviour 4, 441–442 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0871-4

Haletska I., Klymanska L., & Klimanska M. (2020). Quarantine April in Ukraine: thoughts, experiences, behaviour faced with the threat of COVID-19. Psychological Journal, 6 (5), 18-36. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.5.2

Johnson, G. A., Vindrola-Padros, C. (2017). Rapid qualitative research methods during complex health emergencies: A systematic review of the literature. Social Science and Medicine, 189, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.029

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge

Oosterhoff, B., & Palmer, C. (2020). Psychological Correlates of News Monitoring, Social Distancing, Disinfecting, and Hoarding Behaviors among US Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic. PsyArXiv, March 23. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rpcy4

Постанова Кабінету Міністрів України №211 від 11 березня 2020 року «Про запобігання поширенню на території України коронавірусу COVID-19» [Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 211 as of March 11, 2020 ‘On Prevention of the Spread of Coronavirus COVID-19 in the Territory of Ukraine’]. Retrieved from: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-zapobigannya-poshim110320rennyu-na-teritoriyi-ukrayini-koronavirusu-covid-19

Renn O. (1992). Concepts of risk: a classification. In: S.Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.) Social theories of risk (pp.53-79). Praeger: Westport.

Rosa E. A. (2008) White, black and grey: Critical dialogue with the international risk governance council’s framework for risk governance. In: O. Renn & K. Walker (Eds.), Global risk governance: concept and practice of using the IRGC framework (pp.101-118). Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media

Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. Current Biology, 21 (23), R941–R945. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.030

Sociological Group ‘Rating’. (2020). Україна на карантині: моніторинг суспільних настроїв [Ukraine under quarantine: monitoring of public moods]. Retrieved from: http: //ratinggroup.ua/files/ratinggroup/reg_files/rg_ua_cc_032020_press.pdf

Soper, G. A. (1919). The lessons of the pandemic. Science, 49 (1274), 501–506. DOI: 10.1126/science.49.1274.501

Stanley, M., Barr, N., Peters, K., & Seli, P. (2020). Analytic-Thinking Predicts Hoax Beliefs and Helping Behaviors in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. PsyArXiv. March 30. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/m3vth

Teti, M., Schatz, E., & Liebenberg, L. (2020). Methods in the Time of COVID-19: The Vital Role of Qualitative Inquiries. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920920962

Vassie, L., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (2005). Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 3:sup1, 65-102, DOI: 10.1080/14774003.2005.11667668

Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of Risk Perception: Who Fears What and Why? Daedalus, 119(4), 41-60.

World Health Organization. (2013) Health and environment: communicating the risks. Retrieved from http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/233759/e96930.pdf

Worldometer (2020). COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. World / Countries/ Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/ukraine/

Published
2020-09-11
How to Cite
Klimanska, M., Klymanska, L., & Haletska, I. (2020). THE LENS, FRAMES AND PATTERNS OF UKRAINIANS: HOW PERCEPTION OF THREAT AND RISK DETERMINES BEHAVIOUR IN THE COVID-19 SITUATION. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 11(2), 444-460. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2020.2.444.460
Section
LOCAL CULTURES AND SOCIETIES