MOTIVATIONAL STRUCTURE OF YOUNG CHEMISTS

  • Radka High Department of Education and Human Sciences University of Chemistry and Technology Technická 5, Praha 6, Czech Republic https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2515-8950
Keywords: motivation of gifted students, future time perspective, science olympiads

Abstract

Aim: the goal of this study is to investigate the motivational structure of participants of Chemistry Olympiad summer camps. The participants are young students who achieved  the best results in chemistry olympiads. Chemistry is one of the least popular subjects among czech students and therefore is important to understand what motivates extraordinary, or gifted students, to learn.

Methods: participants (N=38) completed a combination of qualitative and/or quantitative questionnaires. The primary questionnaire, known as the Motivational Induction Method (MIM), is a quality-quantitative questionnaire that uses the principle of open-ended questions. This method can provided a deep understanding of participants´ plans, desires and wishes but also fears, inhibitions or problems. Other questionnaires used were: the Learning Motivation questionnaire and the Achievement Motivation questionnaire which measure the sources of motivation and proportion of achievement needs, respectively.

Result: the MIM questionnaire, providing qualitative-quantitative analysis, showed that participants´motivation was mainly focused on self (identity) and contact with others (social motivation). The Learning Motivation questionnaires revealed that the two most important motivational sources for learning chemistry were: one, the acquisition of a good profession in the future (instrumental motivation); and two, cognitive movitavation, or simply the positive feeling one experiences from learning something new.  The Achievement Motivational questionnaires revealed that participants´ need to avoid failure was lower in comparison to general pupils.

Author Biography

Radka High, Department of Education and Human Sciences University of Chemistry and Technology Technická 5, Praha 6, Czech Republic

PhD student

References

de Bilde, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory. Learning and Instruction 21, 3

Clinkenbeard, P. R. (2012). Motivation and gifted students: implications of theory and research. Psychology in the Schools, Vol. 49(7). Wiley Periodicals, Inc., DOI: 10.1002/pits.21628

Erikson, E. (1998). The Life Cycle Completed (Extended Version). W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN-13: 978-0393317725

High, R. (2017). Diagnostika časové perspektivy u středoškolské mládeže. [The Diagnostic of Time Perspective in High School Students´]. Dizertační práce. Charles University, Prague

Herrera, D., Martinez, P., & Matos, L. (2015). Perspectiva de tiempo futuro y satisfacción con la vida en adolescentes: un estudio transcultural, (dedicado al Prof. Dr. Willy Lens). Revista de Orientación Educacional Vol. 29 No. 55, p. 37-54

Hrabal, V., & Pavelková, I. (2011). Školní motivace žáků. [Students´school motivation].

Praha: Národní ústav odborného vzdělávání, ISBN: 978-80-87063-34-7.

Hrabal, V., Man, F., & Pavelková, I. (1989). Psychologické otázky motivace ve škole [Psychological Questionsof Motivation at School]. Praha: SPN.

Hrabal, V., & Pavelková, I. (2011). Školní výkonová motivace žáků: Dotazník pro žáky; [Achievement motivation at school: Questionnaire for students.]. Evaluační nástroje; Národní ústav odborného vzdělávání: Praha

Janštová, V., Dvořáková, R., & Jáč, M. (2016). Identifying the factors that motivate pupils toward science competitions. Conference Paper

Lens, W., Paixão, M. P., Herrera, D., & Grobler, A. (2012). Future time perspective as a motivational variable: Content and extension of future goals affect the quantity and quality of motivation. Japanese Psychological Research, Volume 54, No. 3, 321–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00520.x

Morisano, D., & Shore, B. M. (2010). Can Personal Goal Setting Tap the Potential of the Gifted Underachiever? Roeper Review, 32:249–258, ISSN: 0278-3193 print / 1940-865X online. DOI: 10.1080/02783193.2010.508156

Nuttin, J. (1980). Future Time Perspective and Motivation. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Pavelková, I., & Dvořáková, I. (2015). Motivace v úkolové situaci. [Motivation in task situation]. Pedagogika, roč. 65, č. 1, s. 34–56

Pavelková, I., Hrabal, K., & Hrabal, V. (2010). Mezinárodní srovnání motivačních zdrojů učební činnosti žáku. [International comparison of motivational sources of students ́ learning tasks]. Pedagogika, 60 (3{4), 97{107.

Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible program for the gifted. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Seginer, R., & Lens, W. (2014). The Motivational Properties of Future Time Perspective Future Orientation: Different Approaches, Different Cultures In Maciej Stolarski, Nicolas Fieulaine, Wessel van Beek. Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application: Essays in Honor of Philip G. Zimbardo. Springer

Urhahnea, D., Ho, L. H., Parchmann, I., & Nick, S. (2012). Attempting to predict success in the qualifying round of the International Chemistry Olympiad. High Ability Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2, 167–182

Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Soenens, B., & Lens. W. (2004). How to Become a Persevering Exerciser? Providing a Clear, Future Intrinsic Goal in an Autonomy-Supportive Way. Journal of sport & exercise psychology, 26, 232-249

Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77

Published
2019-09-02
How to Cite
High, R. (2019). MOTIVATIONAL STRUCTURE OF YOUNG CHEMISTS. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 10(2), 255-269. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20192.255.269
Section
LOCAL CULTURES AND SOCIETIES