Ecopedagogy: Biology Learning Profile Of High School In Pulau Timor


  • Nurdiyah Lestari Postgraduate School Student, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo No1 Karangmalang, Depok, Sleman, 55281, Yogkarata, Indonesia
  • Paidi Paidi Biologi Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo No1 Karangmalang, Depok, Sleman, 55281, Yogkarata, Indonesia
  • Slamet Suyanto Biologi Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo No1 Karangmalang, Depok, Sleman, 55281, Yogkarata, Indonesia



Biology Learning, model ecopedagogy, contextual, local wisdom


Aim. The purpose of this article is to increase human ecological awareness to protect, care for and preserve nature, its application in Indonesian schools is still limited. This study uses a qualitative model and aims to describe ecopedagogical models in biology learning and identify supporting factors in the implementation of the high school program.

Methods. This research involved 300 grade 10 students and 20 biology teachers at Kupang High School in East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. Observations, questionnaires, interviews, and documentation were used to collect data about the implementation profile of the Ecopedagogy model.

Results. The results of the study show that: expedagogical learning models must be developed by considering local cultural wisdom, teachers use textual lecture methods in carrying out environment-based learning, learning has not paid attention to local culture. society in a sustainable manner; integration of expedagogical models in media and teaching materials in Biology learning, student enthusiasm if learning is done contextually with an expedagogical approach.

Conclusion. Textual learning must be changed to contextual learning. The curriculum in schools is required to be used in limited complexity by involving the local community, in order to train students' abilities to collaborate, communicate, and improve their skills. there is the development of an expedagogical learning model that pays attention to local cultural wisdom in terms of planning, implementation and evaluation of learning through intensive training activities, bearing in mind that teachers do not yet understand the steps for preparing media and teaching materials according to the curriculum.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Nurdiyah Lestari, Postgraduate School Student, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo No1 Karangmalang, Depok, Sleman, 55281, Yogkarata, Indonesia



  • Paidi Paidi, Biologi Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo No1 Karangmalang, Depok, Sleman, 55281, Yogkarata, Indonesia



  • Slamet Suyanto , Biologi Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Jl. Colombo No1 Karangmalang, Depok, Sleman, 55281, Yogkarata, Indonesia




Abidinsyah, A., Ramdiah, S., & Royani, M. (2019). The implementation of local wisdom-based learning and HOTS-based assessment: Teacher survey in Banjarmasin. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(3), 407-414.

Adams, N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of Medical Library Association, 103(3), 152-153.

Adela, D., & Permana, D. (2020). Integrasi pendidikan lingkungan melalui pendekatan Ecopedagogy dalam pembelajaran IPS di Sekolah Dasar [Integration of environmental education through the ecopedagogy approach in social studies learning in elementary schools]. Jurnal BELAINDIKA (Pembelajaran dan Inovasi Pendidikan), 2(2), 17-26.

Adinugraha, F., Ratnapuri, A., Ponto, A. I., & Novalina, N. (2021). Learning approaches in biology learning. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 11(1), 25-34.

Aliakbari, F., Parvin, N., Heidari, M., & Haghani, F. (2015). Learning theories application in nursing education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 4(2).

Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21st century standards and curriculum: current research and practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150-155.

Ardan, A. S., Ardi, M., Hala, Y., Supu, A., & Dirawan, G. D. (2015). Needs assessment to development of biology textbook for high school class X-based the local wisdom of Timor. International Education Studies, 8(4), 52-59.

Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, Article 108224.

Artaga, R. C. (2021). Mastery of science concepts improves scientific attitude in elementary school students. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 5(4), 606-612.

Auziņa, A. (2018). Teacher competences for facing challenges of globalisation in education. The Journal of Education Culture, and Society, 9(2), 24-37.

Bakar, F., Avan, Ç., Şeker, F., & Aydinli, B. (2020). Plant and animal awareness in nature education perspectives: Where is blindness? International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 10(2), 122-135.

Barrett, P., Treves, A., Shims, T., Ambasz, D., & Ustinova, M. (2019). The impact of school infrastructure on learning: A synthesis of the evidence. World Bank.

Benavot, A. (2014). Education for sustainable development in primary and secondary education.

Chamany, K., Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2008). Making biology learning relevant to students: integrating people, history, and context into college biology teaching. CBE Life Sciences Education, 7(3), 267-278.

Usman, Y. D. (2016). Educational resources: An integral component for effective school administration in Nigeria. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(13), 27-37.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140.

Dayagbil, F. T., Palompon, D. R., Garcia, L. L., & Olvido, M. M. J. (2021). Teaching and learning continuity amid and beyond the pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 678692.

Dwianto, A., Wilujeng, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Suryadarma, I. G. P. (2017). The development of science domain based learning tool which is integrated with local wisdom to improve science process skill and scientific attitude. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 23-31.

Fadjarajani, S., & As’ari, R. (2021). Ecopedagogy based learning as an effort to increase student ecoliteration and the development of environmental care characters. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 683, Article 012046.

Fajar, D. A., & Agustina, D. (2019). Independent learning for improving English skills of students in English language education, Pekalongan University. Surakarta English and Literature Journal, 2(2), 67-76.

Fauzi, A., Fitriasari, S., & Muthaqin, D. I. (2022). Development of student ecological intelligence through the implementation of ecopedagogy. Proceedings of the Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2021), 636, 554-557.

García-Carrión, R., López de Aguileta, G., Padrós, M., & Ramis-Salas, M. (2020). Implications for social impact of dialogic teaching and learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 40.

Glavič, P. (2020). Identifying key issues of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(16), Article 6500.

Hamdani, B., Islam, R., & Hotimah, H. (2021). Engaging students’ autonomous learning across vocational secondary schooling: Teachers’ role and challenge. English Teaching Journal and Research, 1(2), 95-111.

Hapsari, T. R., Rambitan, V. M. M., & Tindangen, M. (2018). Analisis permasalahan guru terkait perangkat pembelajaran berbasis model examples non examples dan permasalahan siswa terkait hasil belajar biologi di SMA [Analysis of teacher problems related to learning tools based on examples non examples and student problems related to learning outcomes in high school biology]. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(2), 204-209.

Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 220-227.

Iaccarino, M. (2001). Science and ethics. As research and technology are changing society and the way we live, scientists can no longer claim that science is neutral but must consider the ethical and social aspects of their work. EMBO Reports, 2(9), 747-750.

Jenkins, A. (2021). Ecological global citizenship education: A reframing. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 13(2), 94-108

Jiang, F., Lu, S., Zhu, X., & Song, X. (2021). Social media impacts the relation between interpersonal conflict and job performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 59(3), 420-441.

Kafu-Quvane, B., & Chikoko, V. (2019). Factors shaping teachers’ experiences in managing teaching in the era of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) integration across the curriculum. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN19 Proceedings. 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 4041-4047). IATED Academy.

Kang, Y., & Nah, F. F.-H., & Tan, A.-W. (2012). Investigating intelligent agents in a 3D virtual world. In International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2012 (Vol. 5, pp. 4030-4036).

Keeley, M., & Benton-Short, L. (2020). Holding complexity: Lessons from team-teaching an interdisciplinary collegiate course on urban sustainability. Social Sciences, 9(5), Article 76.

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5. Article 34(2018).

Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99-117.

Kobylarek, A. (2020). The pedagogy of shame. Education in the face of the demokratur of ignoramuses. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 11(1), 5-12.

Korsant, C. (2022). A Freirean ecopedagogy or an imposition of values? The pluriverse and the politics of environmental education. Globalizations.

Malik, R. S. (2018). Educational challenges in 21st century and sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 9-20.

Meichtry, Y., Zint, M., Carlsen, W., Hart, P., Sammel, A., Zandvliet., D., & Dillon, J. (2001). Relations between science education and environmental (science) education. A NARST Symposium, Strand 08 (History, philosophy, epistemology).

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. C., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis. SAGE Publications,

Misiaszek, G. W. (2020). Learning from Southern environmental education models: Borrowing ecopedagogy through processes of globalization from below. Éducation comparée: Revue de recherche internationale et comparative, 10, 209-241.

Nasution, R. (2016). Analisis kemampuan literasi lingkungan siswa SMA Kelas X di Samboja dalam pembelajaran biologi [Analysing the environmental literacy skills of grade X high school students in Samboja in biology learning]. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 13(1), 352-358.

Norat, M. de los Á. V., Herrería, A. F., & Rodríguez, F. M. M. (2016). Ecopedagogy: A movement between critical dialogue and complexity: Proposal for a categories system. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(1), 178-195.

Nova, D. A. O., Dwikoranto, D., & Lestari, N. A. (2021). Analisis persepsi siswa terhadap pembelajaran fisika berbasis ecopedagogy dengan metode daring selama pandemi COVID-19 [Analysis of Students' Perception towards Ecopedagogy-Based Physics Learning using Online Methods during the COVID-19 Pandemic]. ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 19.

Nurbiye, U., & Cimenci, H. (2018). Effects of innovative approaches in classes on students’ success. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 9(2), 203-217.

Okur-Berberoglu, E. (2015). The effect of ecopedagogy-based environmental education on environmental attitude of in-service teachers. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 5(2), 86-110.

Okur-Berberoglu, E., Ozdilek, S. Y., Eryaman, M. Y., Uygun, S., & Edizer, Z. C. (2013). Effectiveness of an ecopedagogy based outdoor environmental education program on environmental awareness: Canakkale (Gallipoli), Turkey.

Payne, P. G. (2015). Critical curriculum theory and slow ecopedagogical activism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 31(2), 165-193.

Pirchio, S., Passiatore, Y., Panno, A., Cipparone, M., & Carrus, G. (2021). The effects of contact with nature during outdoor environmental education on students’ wellbeing, connectedness to nature and pro-sociality. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 648458.

Piwowar-Sulej, K. (2021). Human resources development as an element of sustainable HRM – with the focus on production engineers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, Article 124008.

Polasky, S., Kling, C. L., Levin, S. A., Carpenter, S. R., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Heal, G. M., & Lubchenco, J. (2019). Role of economics in analyzing the environment and sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(12), 5233-5238.

Potočan, V., Mulej, M., & Nedelko, Z. (2021). Society 5.0: balancing of Industry 4.0, economic advancement and social problems. Kybernetes, 50(3), 794-811.

Prajoko, S., Amin, M., Rohman, F., & Gipayana, M. (2016). The profile and the understanding of science process skills Surakarta Open University Students in Science Lab Courses. International Conference Teacher Training and Education, 1(1), 980-985.

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 923-945.

Rymbai, W., & Sungoh, S. M. (2021). Promoting student-teachers’ pro-environmental behaviour through ecopedagogy: an experimental study. International Education & Research Journal, 7(2), 21-23.

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories. An educational perspective. Pearson.

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. OECD Publishing.

Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., & Svaricek, R. (2016). Teacher professional development as a means of transforming student classroom talk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 14-25.

Shulla, K., Voigt, B.-F., Cibian, S., Scandone, G., Martinez, E., Nelkovski, F., & Salehi, P. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Discover Sustainability, 2(15).

Sibuea, H. Y. P. (2017). Pembaruan sistem pendidikan di Indonesia: Perkembangan dan tantangan [Education system renewal in Indonesia: Developments and challenges]. Jurnal Kajian, 22(2), 151-162. Kajian/id/126

Sukarsono, S., Chamisijatin, L., Susetyorini, E., & Jayamiharja, F. (2020). Strengthening water cycle literacy among senior high school students in East Java Province, Indonesia through the application of the conservation-based learning model. Journal of Sustainability Education, 22.

Supriatna, N., Romadona, N. F., Saputri, A. E., Darmayanti, M., & Indonesia, U. P. (2018). Implementasi education for sustainable development (ESD) melalui ecopedagogy dalam pembelajaran tematik terpadu di sekolah dasar [Implementation of education for sustainable development (ESD) through ecopedagogy in integrated thematic learning in elementary schools]. Primaria Educationem Journal, 1(2), 80-86.

Surata, S. P. K., & Lansing, J. S. (2015). Engaging student teachers in designing ecopedagogy learning modules for Bali’s subak cultural landscape. NACTA Journal, 59(2), 139-143.

Turner, R. (2011, April 4-8). Teaching zoosemiotics: Discourse about and representations of animals and the nonhuman world in college humanities classrooms [Conference presentation]. Zoosemiotics and Animal Representations, Taru, Estonia.

Uswatun, H. (2013). Autonomous learning as language learning strategy based on students preferenced learning style. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 1(2).

Valencia, M. I. C. (2018). Introducing education for sustainable development (ESD) in the educational institutions in the Philippines. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 51-57.

Wang, X. (2021). Cognitive and affective learning in English as a foreign language/English as a second language instructional-learning contexts: Does teacher immediacy matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 759784.

Wasino, Suharso, R., Utomo, C. B., & Shintasiwi, F. A. (2020). Cultural ecoliteracy of social science education at junior high school in North Java Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(4), 52-83.

Wahyuni, S. (2016). Curriculum development in indonesian context. The historical perspectives and the implementation. Universum, 10(1), 73-82.

Widowati, A., Nurohman, S., & Anjarsari, P. (2017). Developing science learning material with authentic inquiry learning approach to improve problem solving and scientific attitude. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 32-40.

Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2020). Dialogic discussion as a platform for constructing knowledge: student-teachers’ interaction patterns and strategies in learning to teach English. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5, Article 22.

Zwolińska, K., Lorenc, S., & Pomykała, R. (2022). Sustainable development in education from students’ perspective – Implementation of sustainable development in curricula. Sustainability, 14(6), Article 3398.







How to Cite

Lestari, N., Paidi, P., & Suyanto , S. (2023). Ecopedagogy: Biology Learning Profile Of High School In Pulau Timor. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 14(2), 494-511.