Visual Dignity in Art
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2020.1.241.254Abstract
Aim. The aim of this article is to deal with visual dignity in the field of western art throughout the ages as it seeks to present the artistic and design devices employed by artists in order to compose and convey this aura of dignity. Moreover, it addresses the ways in which they create various kinds of atmosphere of respect and dignity felt by the observer regarding the topic and object of the painting or sculpture.
Methods. In order to achieve this aim, the article examines seven masterpieces which explore the visual representations of various perceptions of dignity and their implications. Among the elements affecting the creation of dignity in the visual domain one finds: an impressive or majestic appearance, noblesse, self-esteem, pride, self-confidence, inner strength, authoritativeness and charisma. At times, the respectful treatment of the figures is clear as soon as one views the work, but at others it is implied in the interpretation given to it.
It is not this article's intention to discuss the different perceptions or expressions of human dignity, historically, theologically, politically, psychologically, nationally or socially, but to present them artistically as they are the innate right of people to be appreciated, treated with courtesy and met with ethical behavior.
Results and conclusion. The research done in order to reach a conclusion confirming or contradicting the premises at its base, resulted in a mosaic of situations in which human dignity is reflected. The range of possibilities at the artists’ disposal for creating this value is diverse and includes: composition, use of color, mimesis, embellishment, disfigurement or distortion of reality.
The pieces examined present: a military commander at the moment of his foe's surrender; an author monumentally impressive, man of vision and power and of grand dimensions, rising up from a stone plinth; a stern-faced, disfigured dwarf considered a ‘curiosity’, seated on the ground; a family of farmers living an impoverished and meager life; and a Jesus-like mysterious intellectual and Moses the prophet. All these together at first glance appear to be a strange collection of works, in which the common denominator is unclear or seemingly absent. However, this diverse group is included in the article because of the aura of dignity the figures command or convey. At times, the respectful treatment of the figures is clear as soon as one views the work, but at others it is implied in the interpretation given to it.
Downloads
References
Barasch, M. (1961). Michelangelo. Jerusalem: Mossad Bialik.
Barolsky, P. (1997). Michelangelo's Nose: a Myth and its Maker. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Berzal, J. (2013). Velasquez, The Surrender of Breda. Khan Academy.
Brinkley, C. (2012). Bearing the Cross: Devotions on Albrecht Durer's Small Passion. Saint Louis: Concordia Publishing House.
Brion, M. (1960). Durer, His Life and Work. London: Thames and Hudson.
Brown, J. and Garrido, C. (1998). Velazquez: The Technique of Genius. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Butler, R. Rodin, (1993). The Shape of a Genius. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cladel, J. (1936). Rodin, The Man and His Art, Paris: Grasset.
Conway, W. (1958). The Writings of Albrecht Durer. New York: Philosophical Library.
Dobrzynski, J. (2008). Staring Durer in the Face. The Wall Street Journal, 15/3/ 2008.
Edgar, E. (2003). Velasquez and the Representation of Dignity. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 6: 111-121.
Freud, S. (1955). The Moses of Michelangelo in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: The Hogarth Press.
Goldstein, B. (1992). Reinscribing Moses: Heine, Kafka, Freud, and Schoenberg in a
European Wilderness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hedges, J. (2011). Michelangelo's Moses of the Julius Tomb: The Definitive Michelangelo's Sculpture. Medievalist.net.
Hibbard, H. (1979). Michelangelo. New York: Harper & Row.
Honneth, A. (1992). Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition. Political Theory, 20 (2) 192.
Janson, W. (2001). History of Art. Englewood Cliffs N.J: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Jones, J. (2002). Velasquez's Dwarf Sitting on the Floor. The Guardian: Saturday Review, May 13th,, 6.
Kant, I. (1964). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
Leroux, G. (1898). A Paris: LeVernissage. Le Matin, May 1.
Muller, J. (1976). Velazquez, London: Thames and Hudson.
Nordenfelt, L. (2009). Dignity in Care for Older People, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Normand-Romain, A. (2014). Auguste Rodin, New York: Abbeville Press Publishers.
O'hara, A. (1999). Human Dignity, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge
Rilke, M. (1945). Auguste Rodin. New York: The Fine Editions Press.
Rodin, A. (1921). Les Cathedrales de France. Paris: Armand Colin.
Schapiro, M. (1983). Vincent Van Gogh, New York: Harry N. Abrams.
Simmons, L. (2006). Freud's Italian Journey. Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V.
Van Gogh, V. (2000). The Complete Letters of Vincent Van Gogh, New York: Bullfinch Press.
Vasari, G. (2003). Life of Michelangelo. New York: Alba House.
Wagner-Pacific, R. (2005). The Art of Surrender: Decomposing of Sovereignty at Conflict’s End. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wessels, A. (2013). Van Gogh and the Art of Living, Eugene, Oregon: Wipe and Stock.
Zakovitch, Y. (2010). The Book of Moses within the Book of David. Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CC-BY
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. All authors agree for publishing their email adresses, affiliations and short bio statements with their articles during the submission process.
